The Constitutional Accountability Center, a liberal group that has been critical of the court's pro-business rulings, said corporations again fared well, even if they didn't get everything they wanted. The Chamber of Commerce was on the winning side in most of the cases in which it was involved, said Tom Donnelly, a lawyer with the center. "The court continued to move the law in a business-friendly direction," Mr. Donnelly said.
You are here
CAC's Elizabeth Wydra appeared on Background Briefing with Ian Masters to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Hobby Lobby case.
The Supreme Court ruled that family-owned corporations with religious objections are not required to pay for the contraceptive coverage of employees or their dependents. Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal offers background on the case and Judy Woodruff gets debate on the potential fallout from Elizabeth Wydra of the Constitutional Accountability Center and attorney Kevin Baine.
In the Roberts Court, the First Amendment is a powerful weapon, not for the street corner speaker, but for corporations and wealthy seeking to squelch regulation.
I’ll close by mentioning just how well corporations are faring at the Supreme Court this term. The Constitutional Accountability Center has been keeping track and says the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has an 11–5 record before the court, bringing it to 32–8, or 80 percent, over the past three years.
“Never before in our nation’s history has the Court ruled that for-profit corporations share in the right to free exercise of religion,” Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel for the progressive Center for Constitutional Accountability’s told State of the Union.
"It would be surprising if the Court touted this alternative, apparently less-restrictive means of meeting the government's compelling interest in providing contraception coverage and then later ruled that it was too restrictive," said Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel at the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center.
"Throughout our nation's history, corporations have been treated differently than individuals when it comes to fundamental, personal rights of conscience and human dignity," said lawyers for the Constitutional Accountability Center, a progressive public-interest legal group. "The First Amendment's free exercise guarantee has always been viewed as a purely personal liberty."
"As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explained in a powerful dissent, the Court puts claims of corporations over those of its employees and allows a corporation's owners to override the federal rights of its employees, many of whom have a different set of religious beliefs," David Gans, civil rights director of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a left-leaning think tank, said in a statement.
The Hobby Lobby majority may claim otherwise, but its ruling is far from narrow -- and its breadth starts with the sweeping and novel recognition that for-profit corporations share in the right to free exercise of religion.
In fact, the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Doug Kendall specifically noted in a press statement, “For the first time in our nation’s history, the Supreme Court has ruled that for-profit corporations have religious rights and have accorded them religious exemptions. Despite their attempts to qualify that ruling, it opens the floodgates to claims by corporations for religious exemptions.”
"While the court purports to limit its ruling to closely-held corporations on this issue only, the majority opinion invites a number of 'me, too' religious objections by other companies on matters ranging from antidiscrimination law to other medical procedures such as blood transfusions or vaccinations," CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra told AFP.