Rule of Law

A Lawman who Respects the Whole Constitution

One of the most disturbing planks of the tea party platform is the embrace of nullification and even at times secession in response to federal laws tea partiers do not like.

As we’ve covered here and here, these claims represent subversion of the Constitution by advocates that purport to love and adhere to our founding document.

Focused initially upon the Affordable Care Act, these claims are now being made increasingly in response to federal gun control laws.

In some extreme cases, these claims have morphed into crazy talk about “Second Amendment remedies” and armed resistance to the federal government. (The Founders who participated in the actual Revolution would have laughed these calls for insurrection out of the room. See our earlier coverage of one-time candidates Rick Barber and Sharon Angle.) 

 More widely, and no less troubling, law enforcement officers have been pledging not to enforce any gun-related policies that the Obama administration might initiate, apparently believing that their personal oaths to the Constitution empower them to unilaterally decide to enforce some laws and defy others.

All this makes this level-headed defense of the Constitution by a Republican sheriff from Idaho all the more welcome and worth reading.

 Sherriff Gary Raney has served as Sherriff of Ada County since 2005. He writes in the Idaho Stateman:

I have been asked many times in the past couple of weeks whether I will uphold my oath to defend the Constitution and proclaim an intolerance of federal action against the Second Amendment.

Many others have indulged that pressure and now we see Oregon sheriffs, Wyoming legislators and others making hollow promises to protect you from the intrusions of the federal government. Let me respectfully remind you that we are the federal government, the state government and the local government.

I did not swear to uphold just part of the Constitution. Our Constitution includes the right to keep and bear arms, but it also includes the “supremacy clause” that says that every state shall abide by the laws passed by our Congress.

So, despite the fact that I personally oppose some of the gun control measures currently under consideration, my oath requires me to uphold the laws that are passed by our federal and state representatives.

Raney’s whole statement, published in the Idaho Statesman, is very much worth a read.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV