Fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history
What's New at CAC
See highlights from CAC’s recent work, including media appearances, ongoing litigation, newly published scholarship, and upcoming events.Save the Date! Join us for CAC@10: A Decade of Progress, A Charge for the Future, as we champion the Arc of Constitutional Progress!
RELEASE: Supreme Court: Future of Basic American Rights and Freedoms Now Rests in Hands of a Few Key Senators
VIDEO: Trump’s Abortion Litmus Test for his SCOTUS Nominees
Federal judge appears to sympathize with Dems suing Trump
ISSUE BRIEF: The Russia Investigation: What Happens to the Grand Jury if Mueller Is Fired?
ISSUE BRIEF: The Cornerstone of Our Democracy: The Census Clause and the Constitutional Obligation to Count All Persons
Our Latest Work
Gilmore v. Jones, et al.
New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira
CAC@10: A Decade of Progress, A Charge for the Future
New York, et al. vs. U.S. Department of Commerce, et al.
RELEASE: New Analysis: President Trump Has Good Reason to Expect Judge Kavanaugh to “Protect” Big Business at the Supreme Court
Business looks to Kavanaugh to extend Supreme Court hot streak
CAC on Twitter
Issues We Work On
Our Latest Cases
CAC pursues a litigation strategy unique among progressive legal organizations by relying on the Constitution’s text and history. Our powerful amicus briefs provide invaluable arguments to Supreme Court Justices, legal scholars, and fellow advocates. Our clients include current and former bipartisan Members of Congress, state and local officials, law professors, and various nonprofit organizations. CAC’s efforts help to secure important legal victories in the Supreme Court, lower federal courts, and state supreme courts.
Gilmore v. Jones, et al.Protecting civil discourse from harmful conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones.Read More
New Prime, Inc. v. OliveiraIn New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the Supreme Court is considering whether companies can use the Federal Arbitration Act to block truck drivers and other transportation workers who work for…Read More
New York, et al. vs. U.S. Department of Commerce, et al.In New York, et al. vs. U.S. Department of Commerce, et al., a federal district judge is considering whether the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census violates…Read More
From Our Think Tank
A Banner Year for Business as the Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority Is RestoredChief Justice Roberts and his conservative colleagues may see themselves as umpires, but their calls seem to depend on which team is at bat.Read More
ISSUE BRIEF: The President’s Duty To Obey Court JudgmentsPresident Trump is not above the law. If Trump were to disobey—or direct his subordinates to disobey—a court order, he would be at war with the Constitution’s text, history, and…Read More
ISSUE BRIEF: The Russia Investigation: What Happens to the Grand Jury if Mueller Is Fired?This Issue Brief explores what the grand jury impaneled as part of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation might be able to do—and what it could not do—were Mueller to be fired…Read More
CAC produces scholarship showing that the Constitution’s text and history command progressive results. We publish comprehensive accounts of some of the most important and contentious topics in modern constitutional and federal law through issue briefs, white papers, insights, and our think tank series. Our legal experts also inform public discussion around these topics by giving written and oral testimony in congressional committee hearings.