Another Year of Voting Rights Protection

Today marks the 44th anniversary of the day President Lyndon B. Johnson signed one of our nation’s most important pieces of civil rights legislation into law: the Voting Rights Act of 1965. With the passage of this Act, which outlawed discriminatory voting laws and established federal oversight of election practices in jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting, Congress fulfilled the promise of the Fifteenth Amendment’s fundamental guarantee that the right of citizens to vote shall not be “denied or abridged,” ratified by We the People nearly a century earlier.

The Voting Rights Act is widely viewed as one of the most successful pieces of civil rights legislation in our nation’s history, having brought an end to the “Jim Crow” era of systemic, codified disenfranchisement of African-Americans in the United States. Yale Law Professor Akhil Amar recently called the Act “one of the most important statutes in world history.”

Despite this recognition, however, and despite abundant evidence the Act is still working to guard against re-encroachment of voting disenfranchisement, the Voting Rights Act is currently in peril. In June, in its decision in the NAMUDNO case, the Supreme Court came dangerously close to striking down a critical portion of the Act, casting doubt on the constitutionality of Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize the provision for another 25 years. As we discussed in our “friend of the court” brief with the Court in that case, and our associated report entitled The Shield of National Protection, the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment clearly gives Congress broad authority to enforce protection of the right to vote through “appropriate legislation” such as the Voting Rights Act, and its decision to reauthorize the Act should therefore be left in place.

Let’s hope on this historic day – on which the Senate confirmed the first Latina Supreme Court justice, nominated by the first African-American president of the United States – our leaders in Congress and on the Supreme Court can take a moment to acknowledge the enormous accomplishments of this iconic statute, as well as the need to preserve its protections for another generation of Americans.

More from

Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

NAACP v. xAI

In NAACP v. xAI, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit considered whether the federal government can block people harmed by the operation of a massive power plant near their homes from...
Rule of Law
October 15, 2026

October 2026 Newsletter: In a New Supreme Court Term, CAC Defends the Environment, Workers’ Rights, and Civil Rights

There’s a litigant that the Roberts Court likes even more than Donald Trump: big business....
Criminal Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hayat v. Diaz

In Hayat v. Diaz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether police officers may forcibly enter homes without a warrant based only on “reasonable suspicion” of a crime.
Rule of Law
October 6, 2026

Supreme Court’s Alito Will Stay Even If Democrats Win Senate

Bloomberg
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod spoke to Bloomberg Law about Justice Alito’s reliable support for...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Williams v. Huner

In Williams v. Huner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is considering whether a Pennsylvania prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with rigid neck and wrist braces and effective pain medication violated...
Environmental Protection
October 5, 2026

CAC Release: To Escape Financial Liability for Global Warming Harms, Oil and Gas Companies Present Supreme Court with a Result in Search of a Rationale

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Suncor Energy...
By: Brian R. Frazelle