Another Year of Voting Rights Protection

Today marks the 44th anniversary of the day President Lyndon B. Johnson signed one of our nation’s most important pieces of civil rights legislation into law: the Voting Rights Act of 1965. With the passage of this Act, which outlawed discriminatory voting laws and established federal oversight of election practices in jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting, Congress fulfilled the promise of the Fifteenth Amendment’s fundamental guarantee that the right of citizens to vote shall not be “denied or abridged,” ratified by We the People nearly a century earlier.

The Voting Rights Act is widely viewed as one of the most successful pieces of civil rights legislation in our nation’s history, having brought an end to the “Jim Crow” era of systemic, codified disenfranchisement of African-Americans in the United States. Yale Law Professor Akhil Amar recently called the Act “one of the most important statutes in world history.”

Despite this recognition, however, and despite abundant evidence the Act is still working to guard against re-encroachment of voting disenfranchisement, the Voting Rights Act is currently in peril. In June, in its decision in the NAMUDNO case, the Supreme Court came dangerously close to striking down a critical portion of the Act, casting doubt on the constitutionality of Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize the provision for another 25 years. As we discussed in our “friend of the court” brief with the Court in that case, and our associated report entitled The Shield of National Protection, the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment clearly gives Congress broad authority to enforce protection of the right to vote through “appropriate legislation” such as the Voting Rights Act, and its decision to reauthorize the Act should therefore be left in place.

Let’s hope on this historic day – on which the Senate confirmed the first Latina Supreme Court justice, nominated by the first African-American president of the United States – our leaders in Congress and on the Supreme Court can take a moment to acknowledge the enormous accomplishments of this iconic statute, as well as the need to preserve its protections for another generation of Americans.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...