Drink, to the Progressive Constitution!

Today marks the 75th anniversary of the ratification of the 21st Amendment, or the repeal of Prohibition. Tonight, throughout the land, patriots shall celebrate the Peoples’ constitutional right to manufacture, sell, or transport “intoxicating liquors.”

While we certainly encourage Americans to help themselves to a beer or two this evening in celebration of the repeal, an important historical point bears noting. As constitutional scholars such as Akhil Amar have observed the Constitution has “thus far and in general, followed a progressive course.” What Amar means is that our Constitutional amendments have, for the most part, expanded Americans’ liberties. The 18th Amendment stands out as an exception to this trend, representing one of the few instances in our history where the Constitution restricted individual rights and passed a moral judgment on actions important to a sizeable portion of the American populace. In this regard, one could argue that no amendment has taken the Constitution in a conservative direction more so than the 18th.

It just so happens, however, that the 18th Amendment is also the only amendment ever to be repealed. This history should serve as warning to those who would seek to further amend the Constitution to restrict Americans’ individual freedoms. This evening, three quarters of a century after Prohibition, Americans are out celebrating the repeal, rather than the ratification, of the 18th Amendment – indicating that attempts to pass moral judgment on Americans’ behavior through our nation’s founding document are unlikely to survive the test of time.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...