Drink, to the Progressive Constitution!

Today marks the 75th anniversary of the ratification of the 21st Amendment, or the repeal of Prohibition. Tonight, throughout the land, patriots shall celebrate the Peoples’ constitutional right to manufacture, sell, or transport “intoxicating liquors.”

While we certainly encourage Americans to help themselves to a beer or two this evening in celebration of the repeal, an important historical point bears noting. As constitutional scholars such as Akhil Amar have observed the Constitution has “thus far and in general, followed a progressive course.” What Amar means is that our Constitutional amendments have, for the most part, expanded Americans’ liberties. The 18th Amendment stands out as an exception to this trend, representing one of the few instances in our history where the Constitution restricted individual rights and passed a moral judgment on actions important to a sizeable portion of the American populace. In this regard, one could argue that no amendment has taken the Constitution in a conservative direction more so than the 18th.

It just so happens, however, that the 18th Amendment is also the only amendment ever to be repealed. This history should serve as warning to those who would seek to further amend the Constitution to restrict Americans’ individual freedoms. This evening, three quarters of a century after Prohibition, Americans are out celebrating the repeal, rather than the ratification, of the 18th Amendment – indicating that attempts to pass moral judgment on Americans’ behavior through our nation’s founding document are unlikely to survive the test of time.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...