Rule of Law

Ideologically Diverse Moot Court Panel Votes 8-1 that ACA Individual Mandate is Constitutional

As the Supreme Court gears up to hear oral arguments in the Affordable Care Act cases next week, the Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution tested the central issue of the Act at its Sixth Annual Moot Court Program on March 20.  During the simulated court proceedings, a panel of distinguished law professors, noted legal thinkers, and current and former federal judges — including four Bush (41 and 43) appointees and CAC Board member and former DC Circuit Judge Patricia Wald  — heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of the minimum coverage provision in the ACA and voted 8-1 that the ACA’s mandate that Americans obtain insurance coverage or face a tax penalty is within Congress’s constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.   

You can watch the webcast of this terrific moot court program below:

CAC will attend the actual oral arguments at the Supreme Court next week, so be sure to read CAC’s brief, filed on behalf of more than 500 state legislators from all 50 states in support of the constitutionality of the minimum coverage provision here, and stay tuned to Text & History as developments in these critical cases unfold. 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
August 11, 2021

House Democrats granted limited access to Trump financial records

Washington Post
House Democrats investigating Donald Trump can have access to the former president’s personal financial records...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Rachel Weiner
Rule of Law
August 5, 2021

Biden’s new evictions moratorium faces legality doubts

Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden may have averted a flood of evictions and solved...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Mark Sherman, Jessica Gresko, Joshua Boak
Rule of Law
August 2, 2021

OP-ED: Why Trump Cannot Hide Behind Presidential Immunity for Inciting an Insurrection

Lawfare
Former President Trump is attempting to claim absolute immunity from liability in three civil suits...
By: Dayna Zolle
Rule of Law
August 3, 2021

The Problem with DOJ’s Rule Proposal on Grand Jury Materials

Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to the Advisory Committee on Federal Rules that, among...
By: Charles Miller
Rule of Law
July 28, 2021

Originalism Watch, Sixth Circuit Edition Part II: Judge Thapar Calls for the Supreme Court to “Breath[e] New Life” Into the Nondelegation Doctrine

Back in April, my colleague, David Gans, observed that Sixth Circuit Judge John Bush’s concurrence...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 27, 2021

RELEASE: CAC President Commends 1/6 Committee for Beginning Important Work, Urges Accountability

WASHINGTON – As the bipartisan Jan. 6 Select Committee holds its first hearing, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement and is available...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra