In (Possible) Final Chapter, WV Supreme Court Rules Again for Massey Coal Co.

Late last week, the West Virginia Supreme Court returned what may be its final decision in Caperton v. Massey Coal Co., a case that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court before returning to state court for rehearing this Fall.

On Thursday, the West Virginia Supreme Court overturned a $50 million jury verdict against Massey Coal Company, awarded when a jury determined that Massey had unlawfully interfered with Caperton’s business operations and committed fraud during a deal to purchase a coal mine.  Massey Coal sought a reversal of the verdict from the West Virginia Supreme Court, and not once, but twice, that court overturned the verdict.  The case was re-heard by the state’s highest court because, after the first decision, photos emerged of one of the court’s Justices vacationing in the Mediterranean with Massey CEO Don Blankenship, leading to the Justice’s recusal and the re-hearing of the case.

However, after the court once again returned a decision in Massey’s favor, Caperton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, this time arguing that another Justice on the panel, Brent Benjamin, had also refused to recuse himself, despite calls for his recusal from colleagues.   It turned out that Blankenship had provided more than 60% of the total campaign expenditures spent in support of Benjamin’s election to the West Virginia Supreme Court.

Caperton asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the West Virginia state court’s decision, alleging that Benjamin’s refusal to recuse himself violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due process.   In a 5-4 decision issued this past June, the Supreme Court agreed with Caperton, vacating the West Virginia court’s decision and remanding the case to be heard a third time – this time without Justice Benjamin’s participation.   (Further details about this ruling, including information regarding CAC’s brief supporting Caperton’s Fourteenth Amendment claim, can be found here.)

Having the appeal heard without Justice Benjamin, however, did not change the outcome for Caperton.   In Thursday’s decision, the state Supreme Court again overturned the jury’s verdict, evidently on the ground that West Virginia was the incorrect forum for the suit.   There are signs, however, that the saga may not be over:  In a statement reported by Bloomberg, Caperton’s attorney implied his client may again appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that it raises “a number of serious constitutional concerns.”

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes