John Payton on Your Constitutional Rights: “The only reason you have any of those rights is there’s a Fourteenth Amendment.”

Earlier this month Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) partnered with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF), American Constitution Society (ACS), and the Mexican American Legal and Education Defense Fund (MALDEF) in hosting the event, The Road from Lincoln to Obama: the Constitution and the New Birth of Freedom. This midday panel at the National Press Club discussed the importance of reviving the Reconstruction Amendments under the new Obama Administration, and also highlighted the release of CAC’s report, The Gem of the Constitution: The Text and History of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which explains (among other things) how the Privileges or Immunities Clause was incorrectly written out of the Constitution by the Supreme Court in the 19th-century Slaughterhouse cases.

During the question and answer portion of the panel discussion, John Payton, the President of NAACP LDF and one of the country’s most accomplished civil rights lawyers, discussed The Gem, the reasons for restoring the Privileges or Immunities Clause, and, more generally, the vital importance of the Fourteenth Amendment. His remarks succinctly and powerfully capture the thrust of the work of CAC’s Human and Civil Rights program, and we wanted to share them with you here:

Most of the people in the country would agree with the list of things that Doug [Kendall, CAC’s President] read off, thinking “Gee, we have the following rights…”

The only reason you have any of those rights is there’s a Fourteenth Amendment. You can’t find them in the Constitution as drafted. You just can’t find them. You can see that, “Gee, the federal government can’t do these things…” but that’s not the question. The question is whether any government can do those things.

And the only way we have those things we now see as national rights is that the Fourteenth Amendment has “incorporated” (that’s the phrasing that all the lawyers now use) those rights.

The question that Doug raises is: Was that a cramped way of getting to incorporation — through the due process clause, and substantive due process? Wasn’t it drafted with a much more open door, which is Privileges or Immunities?

If you read the history, these rights were supposed to come in as Privileges or Immunities of being a citizen of the United States. The reason we are stuck in this funny hole, is [because cases like Slaughterhouse did] what was required if you want to destroy Reconstruction.

We’re way past that. We’re way past that. The historians have actually figured it out. They write the right history now. But we’re stuck with these ridiculous cases, where we have a parade of cases that say things that, when you read them, and you read the context, you want to start laughing. But they’re still precedent.

Payton was referring to recent and widely-acclaimed scholarship regarding the drafting and ratification history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which demonstrates that the Amendment’s framers intended for the Privileges or Immunities Clause to be the Constitution’s main guarantor of fundamental rights and liberties. For more on the Privileges or Immunities Clause, download our report here. To watch the entire Road from Lincoln to Obama event click here.

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Morozov v. Field Office Director, U.S. ICE

In Morozov v. Field Office Director, U.S. ICE, the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Lugo-Solet v. Mullin

In Lugot-Solet v. Mullin, the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Rule of Law
September 16, 2026

CAC Release: Plaintiffs File Opposition Brief Explaining Why Trump’s Efforts to Evade Accountability in Domestic Emoluments Clause Suit Should Be Rejected

WASHINGTON, DC – The Constitutional Accountability Center and Gelber Schachter & Greenberg jointly filed an...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Gerald Greenberg
Rule of Law
September 10, 2026

September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country

This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Womble v. Patel

In Womble v. Patel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether a North Carolina prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with a hearing-aid battery violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Perlmutter v. Blanche

In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.