President Washington Would Have Squashed Rick Barber Like a Grape

by Doug Kendall, President & Founder, and Hannah McCrea, Online Communications Director, Constitutional Accountability Center

The efforts of Tea Partiers to wrap their anti-government agenda within the imagery of our Nation’s Founding reached absurd and dangerous heights this morning with the release of Alabama congressional candidate Rick Barber’s “Gather Your Armies” campaign ad, which portrays a George Washington-like figure authorizing armed rebellion in response to federal taxation and a law passed through the process established by the Founders (the health care bill).  Barber himself is heard in the ad stating that he would “impeach him,” apparently referring to President Obama, and then adds, ominously, “and if that’s not enough . . .”

Watch it yourself:

Allow us to clear up a few things.  First, as every fifth grader knows, our Founding Fathers rebelled against the British tea taxes primarily because the taxes were imposed upon the colonies without any representation in the British Parliament.  That’s why the call that resonated from the Founding was “taxation without representation” — not simply “no taxation.”   In fact, the Constitution was written, among other reasons, to “promote the general Welfare,” and it authorizes Congress to “lay and collect taxes” for that very purpose.

Second, Barber’s ad invokes patriots such as George Washington apparently to support a proposition that Washington would surely have found abhorrent:  that citizens should engage in armed rebellion in response to government actions sanctioned by our Constitution.   In fact, we know precisely how President Washington would have responded if the armed rebellion suggested by Barber materialized: he would have crushed it.  We know this because just such a rebellion – the Whiskey Rebellion – happened during Washington’s presidency.

Like Barber and his tea party friends, the whiskey rebels of the late 17th Century believed the federal government had overreached and had unfairly imposed taxes upon them.  As recounted in Ron Chernow’s brilliant biography of Alexander Hamilton, President Washington – surely the greatest patriot this country has known – determined this rebellion must be crushed, stating that if “a minority is to dictate to the majority, there is an end put at one stroke to republican government.”  (p. 473) Then the 62-year old Father of our Country joined Alexander Hamilton and the federal army on a westward journey that put the rebellion to rest.

President Washington would have “gathered the armies” if Barber made good on his veiled threats, not in support of, but in opposition to, Barber’s objectives.

More from

Access to Justice
April 20, 2026

CAC Release: Court Considers Whether to Expand or Restrict Authority of Federal Courts to Collaterally Review State Court Judgments

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in T.M. v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
April 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Whether Investor Harm Is a Prerequisite to an Award of Disgorgement in a Civil Action Brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s oral argument at the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. Securities...
By: Simon Chin
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 15, 2026

David Gans on the History of the Reconstruction Amendments, and the Connection to Current Supreme Court Cases, including Callais

Election Law Blog
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans' article in Slate about...
Access to Justice
April 14, 2026

Doctors Hope Justices Maintain Shield Against Med Mal Suits

CAC Kendall Fellow Michelle Berger discussed CAC's amicus brief in T.M. v. University of Maryland with Law360....
Civil and Human Rights
April 15, 2026

The Supreme Court Has a Chance to Revolutionize Its Approach to the Law

Slate
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans wrote about...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
April 15, 2026

Court to contemplate SEC’s use of disgorgement in securities enforcement

SCOTUSBlog
CAC's amici brief on behalf of legal scholars in Sripetch v. SEC was featured in SCOTUSblog. Read more...