Robert Gibbs Gets to the Point: President Obama Seeks a Supreme Court Nominee Who Will Follow the Rule of Law

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded yesterday to comments by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has said he hopes President Obama will nominate someone to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter who will “abide by the rule of law,” someone who is not a “radical” or an “extremist.” When asked about these comments yesterday, Gibbs dismissed the implication that anyone is interested in nominating “an extremist” and noted that the president is looking for:
[S]omebody that understands the rule of law, somebody that has a record of excellence and integrity, somebody who also understands how these opinions affect everyday lives, and will exercise some common sense.
This is exactly the kind of messaging we recently encouraged the Obama Administration to adopt. As he has done so eloquently in other areas of his campaign and presidency, the President and his staff must emphasize that the nation’s support for the Constitution and the rule of law is a source of unity, not division, and incorporate the search for “empathy” in a judicial nominee into an unequivocal message that the role of judges is to interpret the actual provisions, principles, and purposes of the Constitution and laws.

Here’s hoping Mr. Gibbs and the rest of the Administration continue aggressively making these types of statements when discussing the upcoming Supreme Court nominee, ideally without being prompted by Republican Senators.

More from

Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

NAACP v. xAI

In NAACP v. xAI, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit considered whether the federal government can block people harmed by the operation of a massive power plant near their homes from...
Rule of Law
October 15, 2026

October 2026 Newsletter: In a New Supreme Court Term, CAC Defends the Environment, Workers’ Rights, and Civil Rights

There’s a litigant that the Roberts Court likes even more than Donald Trump: big business....
Criminal Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hayat v. Diaz

In Hayat v. Diaz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether police officers may forcibly enter homes without a warrant based only on “reasonable suspicion” of a crime.
Rule of Law
October 6, 2026

Supreme Court’s Alito Will Stay Even If Democrats Win Senate

Bloomberg
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod spoke to Bloomberg Law about Justice Alito’s reliable support for...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Williams v. Huner

In Williams v. Huner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is considering whether a Pennsylvania prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with rigid neck and wrist braces and effective pain medication violated...
Environmental Protection
October 5, 2026

CAC Release: To Escape Financial Liability for Global Warming Harms, Oil and Gas Companies Present Supreme Court with a Result in Search of a Rationale

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Suncor Energy...
By: Brian R. Frazelle