Robert Gibbs Gets to the Point: President Obama Seeks a Supreme Court Nominee Who Will Follow the Rule of Law

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded yesterday to comments by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has said he hopes President Obama will nominate someone to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter who will “abide by the rule of law,” someone who is not a “radical” or an “extremist.” When asked about these comments yesterday, Gibbs dismissed the implication that anyone is interested in nominating “an extremist” and noted that the president is looking for:
[S]omebody that understands the rule of law, somebody that has a record of excellence and integrity, somebody who also understands how these opinions affect everyday lives, and will exercise some common sense.
This is exactly the kind of messaging we recently encouraged the Obama Administration to adopt. As he has done so eloquently in other areas of his campaign and presidency, the President and his staff must emphasize that the nation’s support for the Constitution and the rule of law is a source of unity, not division, and incorporate the search for “empathy” in a judicial nominee into an unequivocal message that the role of judges is to interpret the actual provisions, principles, and purposes of the Constitution and laws.

Here’s hoping Mr. Gibbs and the rest of the Administration continue aggressively making these types of statements when discussing the upcoming Supreme Court nominee, ideally without being prompted by Republican Senators.

More from

Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 19, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...