Robert Gibbs Gets to the Point: President Obama Seeks a Supreme Court Nominee Who Will Follow the Rule of Law

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded yesterday to comments by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has said he hopes President Obama will nominate someone to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter who will “abide by the rule of law,” someone who is not a “radical” or an “extremist.” When asked about these comments yesterday, Gibbs dismissed the implication that anyone is interested in nominating “an extremist” and noted that the president is looking for:
[S]omebody that understands the rule of law, somebody that has a record of excellence and integrity, somebody who also understands how these opinions affect everyday lives, and will exercise some common sense.
This is exactly the kind of messaging we recently encouraged the Obama Administration to adopt. As he has done so eloquently in other areas of his campaign and presidency, the President and his staff must emphasize that the nation’s support for the Constitution and the rule of law is a source of unity, not division, and incorporate the search for “empathy” in a judicial nominee into an unequivocal message that the role of judges is to interpret the actual provisions, principles, and purposes of the Constitution and laws.

Here’s hoping Mr. Gibbs and the rest of the Administration continue aggressively making these types of statements when discussing the upcoming Supreme Court nominee, ideally without being prompted by Republican Senators.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes