Rush Limbaugh Should Read the Constitution

In his nationally-televised, keynote speech to the CPAC conference last night, Rush Limbaugh pulled the standard conservative trick of claiming the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence as a conservative birthright, under assault from progressives:

We [conservatives] love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life, Liberty, Freedom. And the pursuit of happiness. Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault.

Limbaugh may love and revere these documents, but he clearly hasn’t read them recently. Limbaugh says he’s quoting the Constitution’s majestic Preamble, but it says nothing close to what Limbaugh asserts. Here’s its text in its entirety:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Limbaugh appears instead to be referring to the most famous line of the Declaration of Independence, but he’s butchering that too. Here’s that line in its entirety:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Rush adds in a fourth inalienable right to Jefferson’s list – freedom – and he edits out Jefferson’s grandest ideal, equality. No wonder Limbaugh likes the founding documents so much: he’s edited them to his liking.

There is a serious point here, which is that conservatives often distort our Constitution and other founding documents and act as if the Founding Fathers strangely presaged the present-day Republican platform. The errors are not usually as obvious and ridiculous as Limbaugh’s, but they are there nonetheless. As we’ve explained in more detail elsewhere, progressives need to spend far more time calling conservatives out on their false and distorted claims about the meaning of our founding documents and start making more claims of our own.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.