Senator Grassley’s Unfair Attacks On Merrick Garland’s Intellectual Integrity

WHO-TV in Des Moines, IA reported on comments that Senator Charles Grassley made to a pro-life group about the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court created by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February, and President Obama’s nominee to fill that vacancy, Judge Merrick Garland. Among other things, Grassley said “I believe it is vitally important that we don’t have another liberal Supreme Court Justice whose world view is that the Constitution is a living, breathing document.” More audio can be found here.

 

Senator Grassley, the fact is we don’t know the full contours of Judge Garland’s view of the Constitution, because you’ve practically quit your job as Chair of the Judiciary Committee and run away from holding hearings. Public hearings are the way that Senators discover what a Supreme Court nominee is about, not by simply having oatmeal with them one morning behind closed doors. Merrick Garland deserves more than these unfair personal attacks on his intellectual honesty and integrity. He deserves a chance to face the Judiciary Committee in public hearings where he can show the nation whether he is up to the job of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. 

 

Maybe the reason Senator Grassley has run away from hearings is that he’s afraid Judge Garland is as qualified as people from Miguel Estrada to Ken Starr indicate he is.

More from

Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer

In American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to terminate en masse all of the Department...
Rule of Law
April 28, 2025

Trump’s first 100 days offer blueprint for future presidents to evade Congress

Roll Call
ANALYSIS — As he marks the first 100 days of his second term, President Donald...
Rule of Law
May 1, 2025

Bondi’s Firing of DOJ Lawyer for Lack of ‘Zealous Advocacy’ in Deportation Case Raises Concerns

Law.com
A leading legal ethics scholar warned that the U.S. attorney general’s action may “intimidate DOJ...