Senator Grassley’s Unfair Attacks On Merrick Garland’s Intellectual Integrity

WHO-TV in Des Moines, IA reported on comments that Senator Charles Grassley made to a pro-life group about the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court created by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February, and President Obama’s nominee to fill that vacancy, Judge Merrick Garland. Among other things, Grassley said “I believe it is vitally important that we don’t have another liberal Supreme Court Justice whose world view is that the Constitution is a living, breathing document.” More audio can be found here.

 

Senator Grassley, the fact is we don’t know the full contours of Judge Garland’s view of the Constitution, because you’ve practically quit your job as Chair of the Judiciary Committee and run away from holding hearings. Public hearings are the way that Senators discover what a Supreme Court nominee is about, not by simply having oatmeal with them one morning behind closed doors. Merrick Garland deserves more than these unfair personal attacks on his intellectual honesty and integrity. He deserves a chance to face the Judiciary Committee in public hearings where he can show the nation whether he is up to the job of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. 

 

Maybe the reason Senator Grassley has run away from hearings is that he’s afraid Judge Garland is as qualified as people from Miguel Estrada to Ken Starr indicate he is.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes