Thanks for the Tip, Chief Justice Roberts

Over the weekend, President Obama  announced his intention to fill 15 positions in his Administration using the recess appointment power given to him by Article II of the Constitution, which gives the President the power, while the Senate is in recess,  to fill vacant positions in the Executive and Judicial branches that are otherwise subject to Senate confirmation.   In making this announcement, President Obama explained that the move was needed because Republicans in the Senate have engaged in unprecedented obstructionism in delaying the confirmation of his nominees, preventing key government work from getting done.  Among the positions being filled by recess appointments are two long-standing vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Predictably, Republicans have criticized the recess appointments but what they apparently did not notice is that Chief Justice John Roberts himself suggested it last week.  Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. NLRB, a case asking whether the NLRB has the authority to operate when only two of its five Board positions are filled. The question is a critical one, because the NLRB – whose members are subject to Senate confirmation – currently has three vacancies.  (Think Progress reports that if the Court rules against the NLRB, more than 600 cases it has already decided could be thrown out.)

During oral argument, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal partly attributed the vacancies on the NLRB to obstructionism by Senate Republicans, which prompted the Chief Justice to ask:
And the recess appointment power doesn’t work why?
We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.  Nor, apparently, could President Obama.

Just four days later, the President announced he was making the recess appointments.  In addition to filling two of the NLRB vacancies, the recess appointments will also fill long-standing vacancies in the Departments of Treasury, Commerce, and Homeland Security and in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, as well as on the Farm Credit Administration Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Thanks for the tip, Chief Justice Roberts.

More from

Rule of Law
September 16, 2026

CAC Release: Plaintiffs File Opposition Brief Explaining Why Trump’s Efforts to Evade Accountability in Domestic Emoluments Clause Suit Should Be Rejected

WASHINGTON, DC – The Constitutional Accountability Center and Gelber Schachter & Greenberg jointly filed an...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Gerald Greenberg
Rule of Law
September 10, 2026

September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country

This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Womble v. Patel

In Womble v. Patel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether a North Carolina prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with a hearing-aid battery violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Perlmutter v. Blanche

In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.
Rule of Law
August 18, 2026

Not Above the Law Creator Call

CAC's Praveen Fernandes and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse spoke about what accountability looks like now that...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Sheldon Whitehouse
Rule of Law
August 29, 2026

Interview with Praveen Fernandes, Vice President at the Constitutional Accountability Center

AbbyTheAttorney
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes spoke to Abby Winters about the weaponization of the Department...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Abby Winters