This Day in Constitutional History: The 20th Amendment clips lame ducks’ wings

On February 6th, 1933, the 20th Amendment to the US Constituion was ratified, a “rather technical amendment clipping the wings of electoral lame ducks,” as described by Akhil Amar in America’s Constitution: A Biography.

“Proposed in March 1932 and ratified in early 1933, the Twentieth aimed to reduce the power of lame-duck politicians—public servants who had been repudiated by the voters at the polls but who had yet to be replaced by their spring-chicken successors. Tackling the problem of a lame-duck president, Section 1 moved up Inauguration Day from the old March 4 to a new date, January 20. Current events gave the issue special poignancy. When Congress proposed the amendment, everyone know that President Herbert Hoover was unlikely to be reelected in November. Yet everyone also understood that the soon-t-be-lame –duck president would remain in power for four months after being repudiated, with no mandate (and perhaps little inclination) to do anything, despite the widespread view that immediate action was needed to pull the country out of its Depression.

Although none of this hastened FDR’s inauguration—under a time-delay rule, a la Prohibition, the new political calendar would not become operative until the following electoral cycle—the amendment’s prompt ratification did mean that future generations would not have to wait as Depression-era Americans had been made to.”

Is the new shorter interval still too long? See 2009 commentary from CAC’s Judith Schaeffer.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Immigration and Citizenship
January 21, 2025

States, civil rights groups sue to stop Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Washington Post
Constitutional scholars said the president’s executive order would upend precedent and is unlikely to pass...
Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes