Today in the News, 2.20.09
- “The lawmakers, as well as patient advocates and others, say the Supreme Court’s medical device decision has left patients legally powerless against what they criticize as spotty oversight of products by the F.D.A.” NY Times reports that members of Congress are proposing a bill that would “effectively nullify” the Supreme Court’s decision last term in Riegel v. Medtronic, in which the Court ruled that federal law preempts state lawsuits brought by patients injured by faulty medical devices. More from the WSJ Health Blog, and from us here.
- “This ‘hit and run’ legal theory is like saying that once someone gets a driver’s license, that person can’t be held legally responsible for ramming your car on the freeway and sending you to the hospital.” Also on federal preemption, Nan Aron of Alliance for Justice and John Philo of the Sugar Law Center have a great op-ed in the Detroit Free Press, discussing possible implications of the Supreme Court’s anticipated ruling in Wyeth v. Levine.
- “Eight years ago, the incoming Bush administration reversed a longstanding policy that gave the association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary a central, privileged role in the nomination process.” And finally, BLT discusses whether President Obama will be letting the American Bar Association back in on judicial nominations.
More from
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Climate United Fund v. Citibank
In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oregon v. Landis
In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
February 4, 2026
‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
U.S. Supreme Court
Pitchford v. Cain
In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
January 29, 2026
We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
January 30, 2026
CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment
WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...