Today in the News, 2.27.09

  • “I was troubled by that as incorrect symbolism.” While moderating a panel on Marbury v. Madison yesterday at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., Associate Justice John Paul Stevens stated that he felt Supreme Court justices should take their judicial oaths at the Supreme Court building, rather than at the White House, to show that the Court is a truly independent and co-equal branch of government.
  • “Only in America.” The Economist looks at America’s system of judicial elections through an international lens, having got wind of Tuesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Caperton v. Massey Coal.
  • “Senators, perversely, offered the District a taste of democracy while at the same time not trusting it to run its own affairs.”“If Americans think they were mistaken on this point, the way to correct the error is a constitutional amendment.” This week’s papers feature heated debate over the Senate’s decision to approve the D.C. voting rights bill with an amendment that effectively strips the District of its right to regulate gun ownership.
  • “Only in Florida could a business owner be targeted and fined for displaying artwork; and then in protest of the fine, display the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – and then be ticketed for that.” Finally, World Net Daily reports on a storeowner in Clearwater, FL, who is being threatened with fines of $500 a day for covering up his contested mural with a giant sign of the First Amendment.

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...