Today in the News, 3.3.09
- “A wise decision would recognize the threat posed by record-breaking fund-raising for judicial elections — and make clear that judges and justice are not for sale.” The NY Times editors (who have a long history of chiming in on this case) share their thoughts on Caperton v. Massey Coal, which was argued this morning before the Supreme Court. (Check back with Text & History this afternoon for a summary of the oral argument.)
- “In our view, it’s a straightforward equal-protection issue.” The NY Times reports that the organization Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) is filing a landmark lawsuit in federal court in Boston today, challenging the federal government’s denial of marriage-related benefits and other important protections to legally married same-sex couples via the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). More here.
- “‘Regretfully, if we are not consulted on, and approve of, a nominee from our states, the Republican Conference will be unable to support moving forward on that nominee,’ the letter stated.” The Hill reports that Senate Republicans have sent President Obama a letter threatening to filibuster his judicial nominees – although not a single nominee has yet been named.
- “Some say its role is exaggerated. Others say the decision was simply a manipulative power grab by John Marshall.” Promoting his book The Great Decision, Cliff Sloan begins the discussion at Slate Book Club, by asking Supreme Court experts and historians whether Marbury v. Madison is really all its cracked up to be.
More from
March 5, 2026
Gans on Black Conventions during Reconstruction
David Gans, Constitutional Accountability Center, has published Forgotten Framers: Black Conventions and the Second Founding,...
March 4, 2026
CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects State-Affiliated Corporation’s Claim of Immunity from Suit
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Galette v. New Jersey...
March 7, 2026
Originalist-Oriented Briefs in the Birthright Citizenship Case (and a Counterargument by Elias Neibart)
Respondent-side amicus briefs were due at the Supreme Court Thursday and (as one would expect)...
March 2, 2026
David Gans: Black Conventions and the Second Founding
David Gans (Constitutional Accountability Center) has posted Forgotten Framers: Black Conventions and the Second Founding (79 Stan....
U.S. Supreme Court
Chatrie v. United States
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether “geofence warrants” violate the Fourth Amendment.
March 2, 2026
Slavery and Birthright Citizenship
All the Trump Administration’s arguments for denying birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants are...