Today in the News, 3.3.09
- “A wise decision would recognize the threat posed by record-breaking fund-raising for judicial elections — and make clear that judges and justice are not for sale.” The NY Times editors (who have a long history of chiming in on this case) share their thoughts on Caperton v. Massey Coal, which was argued this morning before the Supreme Court. (Check back with Text & History this afternoon for a summary of the oral argument.)
- “In our view, it’s a straightforward equal-protection issue.” The NY Times reports that the organization Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) is filing a landmark lawsuit in federal court in Boston today, challenging the federal government’s denial of marriage-related benefits and other important protections to legally married same-sex couples via the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). More here.
- “‘Regretfully, if we are not consulted on, and approve of, a nominee from our states, the Republican Conference will be unable to support moving forward on that nominee,’ the letter stated.” The Hill reports that Senate Republicans have sent President Obama a letter threatening to filibuster his judicial nominees – although not a single nominee has yet been named.
- “Some say its role is exaggerated. Others say the decision was simply a manipulative power grab by John Marshall.” Promoting his book The Great Decision, Cliff Sloan begins the discussion at Slate Book Club, by asking Supreme Court experts and historians whether Marbury v. Madison is really all its cracked up to be.
More from
September 10, 2026
September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country
This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Womble v. Patel
In Womble v. Patel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether a North Carolina prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with a hearing-aid battery violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Perlmutter v. Blanche
In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.
August 18, 2026
Not Above the Law Creator Call
CAC's Praveen Fernandes and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse spoke about what accountability looks like now that...
August 29, 2026
Interview with Praveen Fernandes, Vice President at the Constitutional Accountability Center
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes spoke to Abby Winters about the weaponization of the Department...
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
In Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is considering the legality of Wisconsin’s congressional redistricting map.