Today in the News, 3.30.09
- “If the court voids Section 5, it will remove one of the most potent pieces of civil-rights legislation in the government’s arsenal.” The WSJ tells the background story behind Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, in which the Supreme Court must determine whether Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it reauthorized Section 5, known as the “pre-clearance” provision, of the Voting Rights Act in 2006. (Read CAC’s brief in this case, in support of the United States, to learn why we think it did.)
- “‘The A.B.A., even if it might be somewhat biased, will do a more thoughtful and thorough job than most outside vetters.’” In the NY Times today, Adam Liptak quotes Professor James Lindgrin, author of a study used to support the allegation that the American Bar Association is biased in its vetting of judges, while discussing the organization’s historic and future role in vetting the Obama Administration’s candidates.
- “‘If the Republicans want to filibuster a judge, that is directly contrary to what their political philosophy was, but I guess it’s all subject to change.’” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), quoted in Politico, stirred controversy late last week with remarks about the Bush-Era Supreme Court judicial nominations, stating his aim under President Obama is to put moderates on the Court.
More from
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board
In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Comey v. Department of Justice
In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
July 18, 2026
Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
----- Supreme Court -----
Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Wridt v. City of New York
In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
July 16, 2026
CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer
WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...