Today in the News, 3.4.09
- “Scalia is not a big fan of allowing others to act as his conscience. He’s got the conscience market cornered.” Dahlia Lithwick reflects upon yesterday’s oral argument in Caperton v. Massey Coal in Slate Magazine. (A rundown of media coverage of the argument is here, and our own Elizabeth Wydra’s analysis is available here.)
- “[T]he tight standing requirements—‘imminent’ not ‘realistic likelihood’ of harm, and judicial skepticism of groups’ uncontroverted assertions about the size and scope of, and harm to, their own memberships–will make it tougher for groups like Earth Island Institute to get federal court attention for their claims.” Constitutional Law Prof Blog discusses the implications of yesterday’s sharply divided ruling in Summers v. Earth Island Institute, in which the Supreme Court denied standing to environmental groups challenging a U.S. Forest Service action.
- “Wednesday, March 4, 1789. This being the day for the meeting of the new Congress, the following members of the Senate appeared and took their seats: From New Hampshire…” Finally, on this day exactly 220 years ago, the government of the United States officially began operations under the newly-ratified Constitution, thus ending government under the Articles of Confederation. (This quotation appears in the Annals of Congress, in the official record of the first session of Congress.)
More from
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
New York v. Trump
In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
U.S. Supreme Court
Martin v. United States
In Martin v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Supremacy Clause overrides the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)’s express waiver of sovereign immunity when a federal employee’s actions “have some nexus with...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pacito v. Trump
In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
March 13, 2025
March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories
March 7, 2025TV (Bloomberg): Could Trump Saying Musk Heads DOGE Create Legal Issue?
Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services
In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...