What’s Taking So Long? On the Gap Between Election Day and the Inauguration

By Judith E. Schaeffer, Vice President, Constitutional Accountability Center

Is it just me, or does Election Day — November 4, 2008 — feel like a geologic era ago? (And, as I write this, we are still four days away from the Inauguration.) Well, imagine what the period between Election Day and Inauguration Day must have felt like before the ratification of the 20th Amendment in 1933. Back then, the new President was not sworn in until March 4, four months after Election Day. That makes our modern transition period seem like, well, just a brief moment in time.

In the early days of our country, it made sense to give the new administration several months in which to take office. Election returns could hardly be gathered with the speed in which they are now (even if recounts might seem to take an eternity), and travel by horse and buggy took quite a bit longer as well. But by the 20th Century, there was no reason to retain the four-month gap, and so Congress proposed, and the States duly ratified, the 20th Amendment, which fixed the start of a President’s term at noon on January 20th. (The Amendment also shortened the period of time in which Representatives and Senators would serve as “lame ducks” by mandating that the Congress convene in January.)

Some question, however, whether even the shorter interval between Election Day and Inauguration Day created by the 20th Amendment is still too long. Now, for example, with our country in a deep financial crisis, with the Middle East in renewed turmoil, and with the approval ratings of our current President at record lows, would our country have been better off if the President elected in early November could have taken office sooner than January 20th? Given the important decisions that must be made before a new administration can effectively govern, including the selection, vetting, and nomination of members of the Cabinet, is it even practical to think that there could be a shorter transition time?

These very questions are being debated between Constitutional scholars Sandy Levinson and Jack Balkin (as well as numerous commenters) at Balkinizaton. We encourage you to take a look at their discussion, posted here, here, here, here, and here. Whatever you may think of a two-month transition, at least we can thank the 20th Amendment that it’s not twice as long.

More from

Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 20, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...