Rule of Law

Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius

At issue in Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius was the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Case Summary

On March 7, 2011, CAC filed a brief in the Fourth Circuit in Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius in support of the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. CAC’s brief draws on a treasure trove of documents collected by the University of Virginia as part of the George Washington Papers collection, documents that have provided fresh insight into the views of George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and other Founders on the scope of federal powers under the Constitution they helped write.

Our brief demonstrates that the Founders’ Constitution created a national government capable of solving national problems. Under the original meaning of both the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress acted within its constitutional authority in enacting the Affordable Care Act’s minimum coverage provision.

This case came before the Fourth Circuit on the government’s appeal from the decision of District Judge Henry E. Hudson (E.D. Va.) echoing the popular Tea Party meme that Congress has no authority to compel individuals to purchase health care insurance, and that the minimum coverage provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is therefore unconstitutional.

On September 8, 2011, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the challenges to the Affordable Care Act on the grounds that the State of Virginia did not have standing to bring the case.

On June 29, 2012, the Supreme Court denied certiorari. For more information on the Supreme Court’s consideration of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, please go here.

Case Timeline

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Iowa v. SEC

In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB

In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Lackey v. Stinnie

In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.
Rule of Law
August 6, 2024

Another Summer Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four incredible interns who all contributed to our work promoting the...
By: Zach Brown, Harith Khawaja, Indu Pandey, Alex Siegal