Civil and Human Rights

5-4 Vote In Coleman Case Illustrates Court at a Crossroads Over Congress’s Power to Enforce Civil Rights

Washington, DC –  Today, in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court issued a deeply splintered ruling striking down an important part of the Family and Medical Leave Act as beyond the powers of Congress under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.  

Constitutional Accountability Center’s Civil Rights Director, David Gans said, “While today’s opinion does not purport to change the law in any significant way, the Coleman opinion illustrates that the Court’s conservative majority will look to second-guess any effort by Congress to enforce the Fourteenth  Amendment’s guarantees of liberty and equality.”

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “On the cusp of the historic argument on the powers of the federal government in health care, and with challenges to the Voting Rights Act hurtling towards the Court, the Coleman majority’s failure to give due deference to Congress’ express constitutional powers is troubling.”

#

Resources:

JUST RELEASED: The Constitution at a Crossroads (Chapter 3): Enforcing Civil Rights: Will the Supreme Court Strike Down the Voting Rights Act and Other Landmark Civil Rights Legislation? (Explaining the Court’s ideological divide in cases like Coleman): http://theusconstitution.org/constitution-crossroads

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals: http://theusconstitution.org/blog.history/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Coleman-Amicus-Brief-Filed-9-27-11.pdf

CAC Coleman Argument Preview: “Originalist Sins Squared: CAC Files Brief in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Family and Medical Leave Act”: https://www.theusconstitution.org/text-history/3185

CAC Narrative: The Shield of National Protection: The Text and History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendmenthttps://www.theusconstitution.org/think-tank/narrative/shield-national-protection-text-history-section-5-fourteenth-amendment

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV