Civil and Human Rights

5-4 Vote In Coleman Case Illustrates Court at a Crossroads Over Congress’s Power to Enforce Civil Rights

Washington, DC –  Today, in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court issued a deeply splintered ruling striking down an important part of the Family and Medical Leave Act as beyond the powers of Congress under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.  

Constitutional Accountability Center’s Civil Rights Director, David Gans said, “While today’s opinion does not purport to change the law in any significant way, the Coleman opinion illustrates that the Court’s conservative majority will look to second-guess any effort by Congress to enforce the Fourteenth  Amendment’s guarantees of liberty and equality.”

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “On the cusp of the historic argument on the powers of the federal government in health care, and with challenges to the Voting Rights Act hurtling towards the Court, the Coleman majority’s failure to give due deference to Congress’ express constitutional powers is troubling.”

#

Resources:

JUST RELEASED: The Constitution at a Crossroads (Chapter 3): Enforcing Civil Rights: Will the Supreme Court Strike Down the Voting Rights Act and Other Landmark Civil Rights Legislation? (Explaining the Court’s ideological divide in cases like Coleman): http://theusconstitution.org/constitution-crossroads

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals: http://theusconstitution.org/blog.history/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Coleman-Amicus-Brief-Filed-9-27-11.pdf

CAC Coleman Argument Preview: “Originalist Sins Squared: CAC Files Brief in Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Family and Medical Leave Act”: https://www.theusconstitution.org/text-history/3185

CAC Narrative: The Shield of National Protection: The Text and History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendmenthttps://www.theusconstitution.org/think-tank/narrative/shield-national-protection-text-history-section-5-fourteenth-amendment

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 10, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.