Federal Courts and Nominations

5 tips for Sotomayor before her Senate hearings

WASHINGTON Beginning Monday morning, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor enters the most perilous stretch of her path to confirmation as she goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee for three to four days of testimony.

Sotomayor will be greeted by many friendly faces among the 12 Democrats on the committee. But she also will be confronted by seven Republicans who will try to trip her up, pin her down and push her over the edge into a mistake.

Despite the widespread view that President Barack Obama’s nominee will be confirmed because the Senate is controlled by his party, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the committee’s ranking Republican, warned Friday that she still can be derailed.

“You often have events that occur at hearings that do change the dynamic in a significant way,” he told Fox News.

Here are five things Sotomayor can do to avoid skidding off track in her bid to become the first Latina on the Supreme Court.

TELL HER STORY

“You have a great life story: Keep telling it.”

That was the first piece of advice that Ken Duberstein, Ronald Reagan’s White House chief of staff, offered Sotomayor after she was nominated.

Her compelling story – rising from a Bronx housing project to attend Ivy League schools and succeed as a Puerto Rican woman in the legal world – can trump fights over legal issues.

The most important audience is the viewer at home, Duberstein says. Senators will watch the public response very closely, as they did in rejecting Robert Bork and in approving Clarence Thomas.

STAY ON MESSAGE

In her opening statement Monday, Sotomayor must lay out the themes and message of her testimony, and she must stick to them for the next two or three days of questioning.

That is what Chief Justice John Roberts did in his hearings, invoking the metaphor of judge as baseball umpire, impartially calling balls and strikes.

But Doug Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said, “She should one-up John Roberts and say that judging is not done by automatons.”

Her message should be about “what all Americans see as the goal of the legal system, and that’s justice,” he said. Justice requires not just following the law, but relating it to people.

SHOW LEGAL SMARTS

Despite her resume of attending Yale Law and serving as a federal judge for 17 years, Sotomayor still must prove she has a mastery of the law.

That’s especially true since conservatives have complained that on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals she often issued unsigned brief opinions and summary orders – which she must explain is the circuit’s custom.

And because Republicans are questioning whether she can be impartial, she must show she can explain arcane detail about the law and Supreme Court precedents, without giving away her own views of them.

KEEP HER COOL

In tapes and transcripts of her in action as a judge, Sotomayor shows she can become so engaged in a case that she can be aggressive, to the point of being overbearing.

She’s even been called “a bully” by a few attorneys who have appeared before her.

So despite whatever provocation or bait that Republicans dangle, Sotomayor must be calm. She must try to come off not only as levelheaded and evenhanded, but as responsive and helpful to her questioners as possible.

DUCK THE DEBATE

With the presumption that Sotomayor will likely be confirmed, both Republicans and Democrats have said they intend to use the hearings as a “teachable moment” to promote their vision for what the Supreme Court should be.

As Sessions put it in an op-ed Friday, “We must have a national discussion about the role of a judge and what kind of justice we ought to place on our nation’s highest court.”

This, Kendall said, will create a two-level fight during the hearing: one over Sotomayor’s nomination, another over the future of the court.

Sotomayor should stick to her own battle, and avoid at all costs getting drawn into the partisan fight the senators most likely will wage.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche