Rule of Law

A Move to the Brink of Impeaching Trump

Readers urge a broader inquiry not just focused on Ukraine and express fear and hopelessness about what is happening in America.

To the Editor:

Re “House Democrats Unveil Articles of Impeachment Against Trump” (nytimes.com, Dec. 10):

As the Democrats make their case for impeachment, it is crystal clear that President Trump put his personal political interests above the security needs of our nation. This is indeed appalling. However, what I find most disturbing is the president’s continual pronouncements that he’s done nothing wrong.

If he does not understand that what he did was wrong, then I fear what he could do next and how a foolish or immoral act could put our country in jeopardy. Mr. Trump is a danger to all Americans (and beyond), and therefore must be removed from office.

Shoshana Silberman
Lawrenceville, N.J.

To the Editor:

It is disappointing that the articles of impeachment against President Trump are limited solely to the Ukraine matter and exclude the uncontested acts of obstruction of justice documented in the Mueller report.

Overlooking Mr. Trump’s blatant and repeated efforts to interfere with the Mueller investigation sets a dangerous precedent, encouraging lawlessness by future presidents and weakness by future Congresses.

The Constitutional Accountability Center has drafted three clear and well-documented articles of impeachment that tightly connect Mr. Trump’s obstruction of the investigation into foreign interference in the 2016 election to his solicitation of foreign interference in the 2020 election.

If Mitch McConnell secures blind loyalty from Senate Republicans to acquit Mr. Trump, it is all the more important that the articles of impeachment for all time document the full and sweeping extent of Mr. Trump’s violation of his constitutional oath to preserve and protect the Constitution.

Stephen F. Rohde
Los Angeles
The writer is a retired constitutional lawyer.

To the Editor:

Tears began rolling out of my eyes as I was sitting in my recliner on Monday watching the impeachment hearings in the Judiciary Committee. As I wiped them away, I realized they were coming from a place of hopelessness and sadness about what is happening in this country right now.

I am a 69-year-old retired woman who has lived through three impeachment inquiries now, the Vietnam War, the assassinations of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the Kennedy brothers. I have lived in Africa for 12 years fighting for reproductive health rights, AIDS prevention and treatment, family planning, malaria prevention.

But through all of that I have never felt such hopelessness as I feel now in light of the vitriol, the divisiveness, the disrespect and the lies that we are now facing. How can we turn around from this path we are heading down?

For the G.O.P. to strategize about how to diminish what they know is the truth, how to twist facts to intentionally mislead the viewers — how can one fight that? I cry as I have never cried before for the future of our country, and for democracy as a whole.

Jeannie Brown
Philadelphia

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Rule of Law
March 18, 2025

Feds, NLRB’s Wilcox urge quick ruling on reinstatement

HR Dive
The defendants said a district court’s ruling “works a grave harm to the separation of...
Rule of Law
March 18, 2025

RELEASE: At Oral Argument, D.C. Circuit Judges Contend with Dangerous and Unprecedented Claims for Unlimited Executive Power over Longstanding Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the D.C. Circuit court today in Wilcox v....
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

New York v. Trump

In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pacito v. Trump

In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
Rule of Law
March 13, 2025

March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories