Voting Rights and Democracy

A Victory for Racial Equality in Voting Rights

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Cooper v. Harris, concerning racial gerrymanders in the drawing of North Carolina legislative districts, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans issued the following reaction: 

“Today’s ruling is the Court’s second reaffirmation this Term that, when states draw legislative districts, courts will undertake a careful review to ensure states follow the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection of the law. It is significant that the majority today struck down North Carolina’s drawing of a legislative district that gratuitously invoked the Voting Rights Act in order to pack African American voters into certain districts, lessening their influence elsewhere.  This is an important ruling that limits the power of states to use race for political ends.  

“Finally, it is significant that Justice Thomas joined the majority today, but it is not surprising – since he takes a race-blind view – that he insisted the Court strictly review racial gerrymanders.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Cooper v. Harris: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/McCrory_v_Harris_Amicus_FINAL.pdf 

“Supreme Court should reject N.C. redistricting,” David Gans, Charlotte Observer, December 3, 2016: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article118530818.html 

“Voting Rights Back at the Supreme Court: The Big Racial Gerrymandering Cases You Haven’t Heard Of,” David Gans, Balkinization, December 1, 2016: https://balkin.blogspot.com/2016/12/voting-rights-back-at-supreme-court-big.html 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###
 

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...