Rule of Law

ACA at the Supreme Court: Instant Commentaries ACA: DAY ONE

Very likely the Court will rule now on ACA’s merits

For all the excitement outside the Supreme Court, the courtroom this morning was surprisingly subdued, as the justices considered the somewhat dry issue of the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA). Indeed, a few of the justices appeared dangerously close to nodding off. That said, it appeared from the questions this morning that the justices are not eager to delay ruling on the merits of the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Many of the justices questioned whether the AIA is, in fact, jurisdictional, and if they could accept the government’s position that the Anti-Injunction Act does not prevent a decision on the merits at this point. The bottom line is that it looks very likely that the Court will not delay a ruling on the constitutionality of the mandate until the provision goes into effect in 2014. For the American people, and the state leaders who are already working to implement the Affordable Care Act in the states, this is good news. — Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel, Constitutional Accountability Center

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 22, 2025

PODCAST NPR’s The Indicator from Planet Money: How Trump is making coin from $TRUMP coin

NPR
[audio mp3="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NPR7405315985.mp3"][/audio] Just before Trump began his second administration in January, he and his business...
Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...