Brianne Gorod is chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, one of the groups representing ASISTA. She said that, based on time limits established in the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, the president has exhausted his legal authority to place temporary, acting directors at the helm of ICE.
Rule of Law
Advocates In Conn. Sue ICE, Claiming Agency’s Acting-Director Is Serving Illegally
A lawsuit filed Thursday in Connecticut’s U.S. District Court alleges the Trump administration’s acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Matthew Albence, is illegally serving in that position and, therefore, some enforcement changes enacted under his authority are unlawful.
Lawyers on behalf of Suffield, Conn., based-ASISTA Immigration Assistance say federal law requires the director of ICE be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. It’s been more than three years since the agency was led by a Senate-confirmed director.
“Matthew Albence was not allowed to be acting director of ICE after August 1, 2019, based on the explicit limits set out in the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. But, not withstanding that, he continued purporting to be the acting director of ICE and he continued taking official actions under the authority of that office,” Gorod said.
According to the reform act, the office of ICE director can be filled by an acting official for up to 210 days after a presidential nomination is either rejected, withdrawn or returned by the Senate. This 210-day extension may be applied twice before mandating a permanent, Senate-confirmed leader take the helm of the agency. The second extension period ended on August 1, 2019, while Albence continued to serve as an acting director, a position he holds today.
A spokesperson for ICE declined to comment on the suit.
The suit specifically challenges a revision announced by ICE on Aug. 2, 2019, which alters the way U visa applicants request protection from deportation. Some victims of crime who are in the U.S. without proper documentation and cooperate with law enforcement investigations are able to apply for legal status in the country through the U visa program. But advocates say the wait is often years long and applicants generally are not safe from removal proceedings during that time period.
###
More from Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
New York v. Trump
In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pacito v. Trump
In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
March 13, 2025
March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories
March 7, 2025TV (Bloomberg): Could Trump Saying Musk Heads DOGE Create Legal Issue?
Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services
In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...
March 5, 2025
The Virtues and Necessity of Independent Agencies
In the month and a half since President Trump took office for his second term,...