Federal Courts and Nominations

After Confirmation to Supreme Court, Burden on Gorsuch Remains

Washington, DC – On news of the Senate’s confirmation of President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch – the day after Republican Leader Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules to enable Gorsuch’s confirmation with less than 60 votes – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

“As the Supreme Court faces critical cases that require balancing interests in religious liberty and equal protection; assessing the constitutionality of reasonable gun regulations; and determining how readily injured individuals can access the courts, we hope that a Justice Gorsuch will be the originalist that he professes to be. In fact, as we have argued, he must be a true originalist who respects the Constitution’s entire text and history. 

“When President Trump nominated Judge Gorsuch, we said he had a heavy burden to prove, given that the President promised during the 2016 campaign to pick Supreme Court nominees who meet his litmus tests on abortion, guns, and evangelical religious liberty. We concluded that Gorsuch hadn’t met that burden during his confirmation hearing, given his unwillingness to recognize that core fundamental rights are protected under an originalist understanding of the Constitution. This unwillingness heightened our concerns that he is only a selective originalist, unwilling to respect the entire text and history of the Constitution, and we felt compelled to oppose his nomination.   

“But now that he has been confirmed, we certainly hope that Justice Gorsuch will fulfill Judge Gorsuch’s commitments: to be an independent jurist, to be a good judge who respects precedent, to be an originalist who respects the Constitution’s radical guarantee of equality and follows the text and history of the Constitution wherever it leads. From the rights of workers, to the right of women to be equal citizens, to the right of African-Americans to vote free from racial discrimination – the burden remains on Gorsuch to prove that he will be a Justice who fairly applies the law and the Constitution and does not, contrary to President Trump’s promises, just represent certain segments of the population.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s work on President Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court: https://theusconstitution.org/nomination-judge-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 10, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.