Federal Courts and Nominations

After Confirmation to Supreme Court, Burden on Gorsuch Remains

Washington, DC – On news of the Senate’s confirmation of President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch – the day after Republican Leader Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules to enable Gorsuch’s confirmation with less than 60 votes – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

“As the Supreme Court faces critical cases that require balancing interests in religious liberty and equal protection; assessing the constitutionality of reasonable gun regulations; and determining how readily injured individuals can access the courts, we hope that a Justice Gorsuch will be the originalist that he professes to be. In fact, as we have argued, he must be a true originalist who respects the Constitution’s entire text and history. 

“When President Trump nominated Judge Gorsuch, we said he had a heavy burden to prove, given that the President promised during the 2016 campaign to pick Supreme Court nominees who meet his litmus tests on abortion, guns, and evangelical religious liberty. We concluded that Gorsuch hadn’t met that burden during his confirmation hearing, given his unwillingness to recognize that core fundamental rights are protected under an originalist understanding of the Constitution. This unwillingness heightened our concerns that he is only a selective originalist, unwilling to respect the entire text and history of the Constitution, and we felt compelled to oppose his nomination.   

“But now that he has been confirmed, we certainly hope that Justice Gorsuch will fulfill Judge Gorsuch’s commitments: to be an independent jurist, to be a good judge who respects precedent, to be an originalist who respects the Constitution’s radical guarantee of equality and follows the text and history of the Constitution wherever it leads. From the rights of workers, to the right of women to be equal citizens, to the right of African-Americans to vote free from racial discrimination – the burden remains on Gorsuch to prove that he will be a Justice who fairly applies the law and the Constitution and does not, contrary to President Trump’s promises, just represent certain segments of the population.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s work on President Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court: https://theusconstitution.org/nomination-judge-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...