Federal Courts and Nominations

After Confirmation to Supreme Court, Burden on Gorsuch Remains

Washington, DC – On news of the Senate’s confirmation of President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch – the day after Republican Leader Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules to enable Gorsuch’s confirmation with less than 60 votes – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

“As the Supreme Court faces critical cases that require balancing interests in religious liberty and equal protection; assessing the constitutionality of reasonable gun regulations; and determining how readily injured individuals can access the courts, we hope that a Justice Gorsuch will be the originalist that he professes to be. In fact, as we have argued, he must be a true originalist who respects the Constitution’s entire text and history. 

“When President Trump nominated Judge Gorsuch, we said he had a heavy burden to prove, given that the President promised during the 2016 campaign to pick Supreme Court nominees who meet his litmus tests on abortion, guns, and evangelical religious liberty. We concluded that Gorsuch hadn’t met that burden during his confirmation hearing, given his unwillingness to recognize that core fundamental rights are protected under an originalist understanding of the Constitution. This unwillingness heightened our concerns that he is only a selective originalist, unwilling to respect the entire text and history of the Constitution, and we felt compelled to oppose his nomination.   

“But now that he has been confirmed, we certainly hope that Justice Gorsuch will fulfill Judge Gorsuch’s commitments: to be an independent jurist, to be a good judge who respects precedent, to be an originalist who respects the Constitution’s radical guarantee of equality and follows the text and history of the Constitution wherever it leads. From the rights of workers, to the right of women to be equal citizens, to the right of African-Americans to vote free from racial discrimination – the burden remains on Gorsuch to prove that he will be a Justice who fairly applies the law and the Constitution and does not, contrary to President Trump’s promises, just represent certain segments of the population.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s work on President Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court: https://theusconstitution.org/nomination-judge-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Rule of Law
September 8, 2024

Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election

Salon
The Supreme Court conservative majority’s opinion in Trump v. United States has rightly drawn considerable criticism.  Its...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Donald K. Sherman
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.