Almost 200 Democrats Are About to Sue President Trump Over His Business Ties

By Madeline Farber

Almost 200 Democratic members of Congress are going to sue President Donald Trump.

On Wednesday, the members agreed to file a lawsuit against Trump, the Washington Post reports. They allege that he has violated constitutional restrictions on taking gifts and benefits from foreign leaders because he still has international business interests.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is the lead senator who filed the complaint in federal district court, according to the Post. Blumenthal said that the lawsuit has 196 congressional plaintiffs, which is more than any other legal action ever taken against a president. Only Democrats have joined the lawsuit as of now, but Republicans are able to join if they wish.

According to a copy of the legal complaint as reviewed by Post, the lawsuit argues that Congress members have special standing because of the Constitution’s “foreign emoluments clause.” The clause says: “[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” The language of the clause, according to the Post, is interpreted as prohibiting the president or any officeholder from accepting a gift, payment or any other benefit from a foreign state without first getting consent from Congress.

Therefore, the lawsuit argues that the president must obtain “the consent of Congress” before accepting any gifts, according to the Post.

The White House was not immediately available for comment when contacted by Fortune.

More from

Corporate Accountability

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Rule of Law
June 20, 2024

Opinion | The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

Washington Post
Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public...
By: Nina Henry
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
June 19, 2024

The Supreme Court’s approach on ‘history and tradition’ is irking Amy Coney Barrett

Washington (CNN) — On a Supreme Court where the conservative supermajority increasingly leans on history as a...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Devan Cole, John Fritze