American History According to the Tea Party

 

American Prospect
American History According to the Tea Party
By JAMELLE BOUIE
May 13, 2011

 

Along with Mike Huckabee, the Tea Party Patriots are trying to reach out to America’s youth with a wildly distorted version of the nation’s history:

As part of the “adopt a school” campaign, TPP and its members are advising school officials to rely on lesson plans, DVDs, and a package of other course materials created by the National Center for Constitutional Studies (NCCS). The group was founded by Cleon Skousen, a rabid anti-Communist with a highly controversial take on American history. Skousen, who died in 2006, was the author of Glenn Beck’s favorite book on the Constitution, The 5,000 Year Leap. Among other things, he promoted the idea that the Constitution is a divine document that may have biblical roots.

As part of his curriculum, Skousen required attendees to recite his “28 Principles of Liberty”, which includes boilerplate like “Mankind are endowed by God with certain unalienable rights,” and absolute gems like, “The United States has a manifest destiny to eventually become a glorious example of God’s law under a restored Constitution that will inspire the entire human race.” I spoke briefly with Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center, who issued a statement criticizing the Tea Party Patriots for this move to bring Skousen’s ideology into public schools. Summing up the National Center for Constitutional Studies’ curriculum, he called it “a combination of banality and rank partisanship that is both odd and disturbing.” That sounds about right.

I should say that there is some cause for concern. In Texas, to use one example, Tea Party members pushed through a radical revision of the social studies curriculum which echoed material written by Skousen and the National Center for Constitutional Studies. Most students won’t have to worry about this pseudo-history, but some will, and that’s a legitimate problem.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 26, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...