Corporate Accountability

Anti-Citizens United Amendment Ballot Measure Gets Favorable Hearing

Washington, DC – In August of last year, the California Supreme Court issued a temporary stay, which removed from the 2014 state ballot a measure known as Proposition 49, which calls for an advisory vote by Californians on a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. FEC and give the people the power to regulate money in politics. Ruling by a vote of 5-1, the court ordered full briefing of the case on the merits, with Justice Goodwin Liu writing a lengthy concurring opinion setting out his views about why this measure did not belong on the ballot. A year later, after extensive briefing, the Justices today heard oral argument.    

 

“Today’s oral argument sounded like a sharp turnaround from the temporary ruling that removed Proposition 49 from the ballot a year ago last August,” CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans observed. “Many of the Justices—including Justice Liu—recognized that the state legislature has a special role in the federal amendment process. Under our constitutional system, the legislature has clear authority to seek the input of the people in deciding whether to call for an amendment to our nation’s charter. The people of the state of California should not be denied the opportunity to show their support for overturning rulings, such as Citizens United, that pervert the Constitution and harm our democracy.” 

 

CAC Counsel Tom Donnelly continued, “Americans remain deeply concerned about the corrupting influence of money in politics, Californians included. Proposition 49 simply gives them a say in finding a solution.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. Padilla: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/howard-jarvis-taxpayers-association-v-padilla-cal-sup-ct 

 

“Money in Politics in California: Let the Voters Have Their Say,” Tom Donnelly, Huffington Post, October 5, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-donnelly/money-in-politics-in-cali_b_8246232.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV