Federal Courts and Nominations

Arguments for and against filling the Supreme Court seat ahead of the election

Carrie Severino, the president of conservative advocacy group Judicial Crisis Network, thinks that it would be “better for the country” for the Republican-controlled Senate to confirm President Trump’s nominee for the vacant seat on the Supreme Court.

“It would be better for the country to have that full complement of justices on the court,” Severino told CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett in this week’s episode of “The Takeout” podcast. Severino suggested it would not be ideal to have an eight-member court when the upcoming election may be contested, adding that “no one really wants to see Bush v. Gore times two.”

But Elizabeth Wydra, the president of the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center, noted that several states have already begun early voting.


Highlights from this week’s episode:

  • Carrie Severino on whether the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled before the election: “It would be better for the country to have that full complement of justices on the court.”
  • Elizabeth Wydra on how the election has already started: “We have never been in this situation before…We are in the election right now.”
  • Severino on Ginsburg’s wishes to have the next president nominate her successor: “We can understand and respect that that’s her wishes, but she would understand that this is a process that would continue.”
  • Wydra on a conservative court potentially striking down the Affordable Care Act: “Striking it down would to my mind as a constitutional lawyer be putting a political agenda above clear constitutional interpretation.”

Severino said it would not be difficult for the Senate to confirm the nominee quickly, since the two top  contenders for the nomination — Judges Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa — were recently confirmed to the federal judiciary by bipartisan votes in the Senate.

“We’re in a very good position to move swiftly,” Severino said.

However, Wydra argued that both judges’ records on the circuit courts still need to be reexamined by senators.

Asked about Ginsburg’s dying wish that her replacement be chosen by the next president, Severino responded,”We can understand and respect that that’s her wishes, but she would understand that this is a process that would continue.”

Wydra said that “people are going to be paying attention to this Supreme Court nomination more than ever before,” given Ginsburg’s fame and popularity among progressives.

Severino also discussed the possibility that a 6 to 3 conservative majority court could overturn the Affordable Care Act.

“It’s not the court’s job to save a law, however helpful, however popular. However, they might not want to do it simply because they think this law is good. The job is really limited as judges to interpreting whether the law is constitutional,” Severino said. “You can have the best law on earth, but if it’s not constitutional, it’s not the judge’s job to try to save it.”

However, Wydra, noting that the Supreme Court had already found the ACA to be constitutional, said that overturning it would be a political act.

“Striking it down would to my mind as a constitutional lawyer be putting a political agenda above clear constitutional interpretation,” Wydra said. She also said that she believed confirming Mr. Trump’s nominee would “100%” put Roe v. Wade in danger of being overturned.

For more of Major’s conversation with Severino and Wydra, download “The Takeout” podcast on Art19, iTunesGooglePlaySpotify and Stitcher. New episodes are available every Friday morning. Also, you can watch “The Takeout” on CBSN Friday at 5pm, 9pm, and 12am ET and Saturday at 1pm, 9pm, and 12am ET. For a full archive of “The Takeout” episodes, visit www.takeoutpodcast.com. And you can listen to “The Takeout” on select CBS News Radio affiliates (check your local listings).

Producers: Arden Farhi, Jamie Benson, Sara Cook and Eleanor Watson
CBSN Production: Eric Soussanin, Julia Boccagno and Grace Segers
Show email: TakeoutPodcast@cbsnews.com
Twitter: @TakeoutPodcast
Instagram: @TakeoutPodcast
Facebook: Facebook.com/TakeoutPodcast

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

CNN
Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed
Federal Courts and Nominations
June 25, 2023

Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects ‘pot shots’ at Supreme Court

CNN
A federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2023

Supreme Court, done with arguments, turns to decisions

Roll Call
The justices have released opinions at a slow rate this term, and many of the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Michael Macagnone