Access to Justice

At Argument Over Housing Discrimination Lawsuit, Conservative Justices Largely Silent

Washington, DC – Constitutional Accountability Center filed a “friend of the court” brief in the cases heard this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court – Bank of America v. Miami and Wells Fargo v. Miami. CAC attorneys attended the oral argument and issued the following reaction: 

 “The Roberts Court is known for a line of decisions that close the courthouse doors to litigants who try to enforce federal law. Today, however, when enforcement of the Fair Housing Act was at issue, it was notable how little the conservative justices had to say,” said CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod.

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “It was indeed striking how little in the way of pushback the Court’s conservatives presented after Justice Kagan and others showed the long history of Congress providing specific authorization for lawsuits that enforce federal statutes.”

“The Justices recognized the special role that the Fair Housing Act plays in fighting housing discrimination,” said CAC Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle, “and seemed to appreciate as well how broad the ability to sue should be to help enforce it, a position Congress expressly adopted when it last reauthorized the FHA.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Bank of America v. Miami and Wells Fargo v. Miami: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/bank-america-corp-v-city-miami-and-wells-fargo-co-v-city-miami-us-sup-ct

“A New Threat to the Struggle for Housing Equality: Bank of America v. Miami and Wells Fargo v. Miami,” Brian Frazelle, AFJ Blog, November 8, 2016: http://www.afj.org/blog/a-new-threat-to-the-struggle-for-housing-equality-bank-of-america-v-miami-and-wells-fargo-v-miami

“How Scalia Made It Difficult to Bring Cases to Court,” David Gans, The Atlantic, August 1, 2016: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/scalia-access-to-courts/493592/

“Keystone of the Arch: The Text and History of Article III and the Constitution’s Promise of Access to Courts,” David Gans, CAC Text & History Narrative, August 2016: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/Keystone_of_the_Arch.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Access to Justice

Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 20, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...