Federal Courts and Nominations

Before Judiciary Committee Votes, Sessions Has Questions to Answer on Justice Department Review of Trump Executive Orders

Washington, DC – On reports that the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel could not confirm that it is reviewing President Donald Trump’s executive orders before they are issued – an established OLC responsibility to ensure the President is following the law – Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction: 

“It is stunning to learn that the Office of Legal Counsel in the Trump Justice Department may not be reviewing his executive orders,” said Brianne Gorod, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center and former Attorney-Adviser in the OLC under President Barack Obama. “OLC’s own website makes clear that the office should be reviewing all executive orders for both ‘form and legality.’ This raises a number of serious questions,” Gorod continued. “If, in fact, OLC is being cut out of the review of executive orders, what comes next? OLC plays a critical role in the Department of Justice, advising the executive branch on a wide range of important legal questions, both constitutional and statutory, to make sure the President follows the law.”

Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra concluded, “Today’s report only puts more pressure on President Trump’s nominee to lead the Justice Department, Senator Jeff Sessions, to prove his independence. In addition to the other questions – presented to him in writing – that Sessions left unanswered for his colleagues, it is now clear that Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley should delay Tuesday’s planned vote on the Sessions nomination until Sessions can answer, first, whether he approves of President Trump’s possible circumventing of the Office of Legal Counsel in issuing executive orders and, second, whether Sessions would commit to requiring OLC to perform its long-established role of reviewing such orders in the future. Trump’s presidency threatens to be the most corrupt in almost 100 years, and the Attorney General must be up to the job of holding him strictly accountable to the law.”

#

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...