CAC Applauds President Obama’s Pledge to Uphold the Constitution Above Special Interests

Washington, DC – In a statement at the Rose Garden this morning, President Barack Obama responded to the increasing prevalence of special interest pledges by reaffirming that the constitutional oath of office is paramount for elected officials in the United States, saying, “the last time I checked, the only pledge that really matters is the pledge we take to uphold the Constitution.”

Last week, Constitutional Accountability Center launched a new initiative called Constitutional Progressives, and has been urging elected officials to reaffirm their commitment to support the whole Constitution and to place this obligation over any pledges to special interests. In response to the President’s statement today, CAC President Doug Kendall said,

“We are delighted that during Constitution Week, President Obama has reminded all other elected officials in the United States of the paramount importance of their constitutional oath. We hope politicians from across the political spectrum will join the President in pledging to the Constitution, not to Grover Norquist, or to any other pressure group.”

#

Resources:

Sen. John Kerry “Dear Colleague” letter celebrating National Constitution Day: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Kerry%20Constitution%20DC.pdf

“Constitutional Progressives: Taking America’s Charter Back From The Tea Party:” http://constitutionalprogressives.org/media/94-constitutional-progressives-taking-americas-charter-back-from-the-tea-party

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

The Supreme Court Just Put the Voting Rights Act in Its Crosshairs Again

Slate
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Louisiana v. Callais, an important battle over...
By: Anna Jessurun
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Immigration Provision at Heart of Today’s Oral Argument Should Not Be a Jurisdictional Trap for Unwary Immigrants

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court today in Riley v. Bondi,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State Efforts to Remedy Voting Rights Act Violation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v....
Civil and Human Rights
March 26, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Access to Justice
March 19, 2025

Fight over False Claims Act whistleblower provision heats up on appeal

Reuters
At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on...