Federal Courts and Nominations

CAC Hails Confirmation Of Pamela Harris To Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Senate confirmed Pamela Harris to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

“We congratulate Pam on the exciting news of her confirmation today,” said CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer. “Pam is extraordinarily well-qualified to be a federal judge, and we expect her to serve with the highest distinction. We also congratulate the Senate,” Schaeffer continued, “for continuing to address the problem of judicial vacancies on America’s federal courts, by steadily filling those vacancies with highly qualified nominees. It is not only the Senate’s constitutional duty to do so, but it is also a critical part of the People’s business.  While there is more work to do on this front this year, the hard work that Senators have put into getting this business done already this year will help ensure access to justice for individuals and businesses across the country.”

 

Added CAC President Doug Kendall, “We would also like to thank Pam for her exemplary service on Constitutional Accountability Center’s Board of Directors for the past two years, and for investing her time and considerable talents in helping make CAC a leading organization on the constitutional left.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC letter to Senate in support of the nomination of Pamela Harris to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_Letter_to_Senate_in_Support_of_Harris_Confirmation.pdf 

 

“When Going Nuclear Makes Sense,” Doug Kendall, July 28, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2854/when-going-nuclear-makes-sense

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

The Supreme Court Just Put the Voting Rights Act in Its Crosshairs Again

Slate
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Louisiana v. Callais, an important battle over...
By: Anna Jessurun
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Immigration Provision at Heart of Today’s Oral Argument Should Not Be a Jurisdictional Trap for Unwary Immigrants

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court today in Riley v. Bondi,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State Efforts to Remedy Voting Rights Act Violation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v....
Civil and Human Rights
March 26, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Access to Justice
March 19, 2025

Fight over False Claims Act whistleblower provision heats up on appeal

Reuters
At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on...