Corporate Accountability

CAC, Leading Members of Congress Defend CFPB in Court of Appeals

Washington, DC – Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Sherrod Brown and House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters led a group of forty current and former Members of Congress – including Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senator Elizabeth Warren, former Senator Chris Dodd, and former Representative Barney Frank – in signing a “friend of the court” brief, filed by Constitutional Accountability Center today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in the case of PHH Corporation, et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in defense of the CFPB.

CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod said, “The members of Congress who signed the brief we filed today, including the principal drafters of Dodd-Frank, provide a critical perspective in this case because they can explain why Congress structured the CFPB as an independent agency led by a single director. These members of Congress know better than anyone that Congress concluded that it was critical that the Bureau be free from undue industry influence and have the ability to act promptly and decisively in response to new threats to consumers. Congress had every right to make that choice.”

Gorod continued, “As our brief explains, the Constitution gives Congress broad authority to shape the structure of the federal government, and consistent with that constitutional text and history, the Supreme Court over 80 years ago upheld a removal provision identical to the one at issue in this case. We feel confident that the D.C. Circuit will uphold the constitutionality of the CFPB’s leadership structure, so that the Bureau, which has been remarkably successful in protecting Americans from the harmful practices of the financial services industry, can continue to operate as Congress intended.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief on behalf of current and former Members of Congress in PHH Corporation, et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/PHH_v_CFPB_DC_Cir_En_Banc_Amicus_Final.pdf

Constitutional and Accountable: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CAC Issue Brief, Brianne Gorod, Brian Frazelle, Simon Lazarus, October 2016: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/issue-brief/constitutional-accountable-consumer-financial-protection-bureau

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Access to Justice
April 29, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Seems Poised to Issue a Narrow Decision in Wrong-House Raid Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Martin v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Nargis Aslami
Access to Justice
April 28, 2025

Martin v. USA: A wrong-house raid ends up at the door of the Supreme Court

Local News Live
WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - It’s a classic David v. Goliath here at the Supreme Court....
Access to Justice
April 28, 2025

Widow of airman killed in on-base crash asks high court for review in Feres doctrine fight

Stars and Stripes
Staff Sgt. Cameron Beck hopped on his motorcycle on a spring day four years ago...
Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...