CAC Reaction After Voting Rights Supreme Court Argument

Supreme Court Plaza, Washington, DC — In the minutes after hearing today’s oral argument in Shelby County v. Holder, a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, CAC President and Founder Doug Kendall issued the following reaction:

 

“The outcome of this case will hinge on whether Congress, or the Justices, gets to decide whether racial discrimination in voting remains a distinct problem in the areas covered by Section 5. As Solicitor General Verrilli repeatedly emphasized, the Constitution itself gives Congress the right to make that judgment.

 

“Unlike Justice Scalia, who called the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act the ‘perpetuation of racial entitlement,’ we think voting rights are this nation’s most established and important constitutional guarantee, and we hope the Court ultimately upholds rather than strikes down this critical statute.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Shelby County v. Holderhttp://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Constitutional-Accountability-Center-Shelby-Supreme-Court-Amicus.pdf

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...