CAC Reaction After Voting Rights Supreme Court Argument

Supreme Court Plaza, Washington, DC — In the minutes after hearing today’s oral argument in Shelby County v. Holder, a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, CAC President and Founder Doug Kendall issued the following reaction:

 

“The outcome of this case will hinge on whether Congress, or the Justices, gets to decide whether racial discrimination in voting remains a distinct problem in the areas covered by Section 5. As Solicitor General Verrilli repeatedly emphasized, the Constitution itself gives Congress the right to make that judgment.

 

“Unlike Justice Scalia, who called the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act the ‘perpetuation of racial entitlement,’ we think voting rights are this nation’s most established and important constitutional guarantee, and we hope the Court ultimately upholds rather than strikes down this critical statute.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Shelby County v. Holderhttp://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Constitutional-Accountability-Center-Shelby-Supreme-Court-Amicus.pdf

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Environmental Protection
December 10, 2024

RELEASE: Some Justices Seem Skeptical of Most Extreme Arguments Seeking to Limit the Scope of the National Environmental Policy Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Seven County...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Gutierrez v. Saenz

In Gutierrez v. Saenz, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal court, as part of its analysis of a Section 1983 plaintiff’s standing to pursue a procedural due process claim against state officials, must...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...