Corporate Accountability

CAC Reacts To Ruling In McCutcheon Campaign Finance Case

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court struck down federal aggregate campaign contribution limits in a ruling in McCutcheon v. FEC, Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction: 

 

“In the last two terms the Court has made it easier to spend and harder to vote, with our democracy suffering as a consequence. The Court purports to rely on precedent, mainly Citizens United, but ignores earlier rulings that recognized that large campaign contributions corrupt our system of democracy.  This Supreme Court does not understand corruption, but the Founders did. The Court’s failure to heed the wisdom of its predecessors and our Nation’s Founders leaves America’s campaign finance laws in a shambles of the Court’s own making. The Court suggests that Congress can fix the problems the Court has created, but it surely knows that with the current gridlock in Congress that is exceedingly unlikely.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief, on behalf of Harvard Professor Lawrence Lessig, in McCutcheon v. FEC: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC-McCutcheon-v-FEC-Amicus-Brief.pdf

 

“Supreme Court Showdown Over Corruption: The Justices Debate McCutcheon v. FEC,” David H. Gans

October 11, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2261/supreme-court-showdown-over-corruption-justices-debate-mccutcheon-v-fec

 

“Big Battles Brewing Over the Constitution’s Original Meaning,” Doug Kendall, Tom Donnelly, October 2, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2237/big-battles-brewing-over-constitution%E2%80%99s-original-meaning

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

### 

More from Corporate Accountability

Access to Justice
April 29, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Seems Poised to Issue a Narrow Decision in Wrong-House Raid Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Martin v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Nargis Aslami
Access to Justice
April 28, 2025

Martin v. USA: A wrong-house raid ends up at the door of the Supreme Court

Local News Live
WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - It’s a classic David v. Goliath here at the Supreme Court....
Access to Justice
April 28, 2025

Widow of airman killed in on-base crash asks high court for review in Feres doctrine fight

Stars and Stripes
Staff Sgt. Cameron Beck hopped on his motorcycle on a spring day four years ago...
Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...