Civil and Human Rights

CAC Reacts to Supreme Court Arguments In Arizona Voting Rights Case

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – Minutes after oral argument concluded this morning in the Arizona voting rights case, Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center President Doug Kendall released the following reaction:

 

“A majority of the Court, including Justice Kennedy, appeared to recognize that the entire point of having a single Federal form was to streamline the voter registration process, and that approving Arizona’s law would pave the way for a patchwork of 50 state forms. We are optimistic that that recognition will lead the Court to strike down Arizona’s law and respect Congress’ power to protect the right to vote in Federal elections.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  CAC’s brief in Inter Tribal, filed along with the Brennan Center and distinguished law professors including Jack Rakove: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona# 

 

*  “The Scalia Court and Voting Rights, Part 2,” Huffington Post, March 11, 2013: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/the-scalia-court-and-voti_b_2853048.html 

 

*  “The Voting Rights Case You Haven’t Heard Of,” Balkinization, March 11, 2013: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-voting-rights-case-you-havent-heard.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes