Civil and Human Rights

CAC Reacts To Supreme Court Decision In Texas Affirmative Action Case

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in the affirmative action case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement:

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans, who was in the Court for today’s decision announcement, said, “The court backed away from the edge of the cliff today. The court surprised most Court watchers by issuing an extremely narrow decision. The Justices did not decide the constitutionality of the University’s use of race in admissions, the big question at the heart of this case.”

 

CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer, also in the Court today, added, “While many expected the Court’s conservatives to try and rewrite decades of precedent upholding the use of race in university admissions, a wide majority of the court reaffirmed the prior pecedents that permit the University to use race in a modest way to foster equality in education.

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin on behalf of luminaries in the study of the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/fisher-v-university-texas/amicus-brief-fisher-v-university-texas

 

“Affirmative action is consistent with original meaning,” David Gans and Adam Winkler, SCOTUSblog, September 5, 2012: http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/09/online-fisher-symposium-affirmative-action-is-consistent-with-original-meaning/ 

 

“Race-Conscious Measures and the U.S. Constitution: CAC’s Brief in Fisher Explains Difference Between a No Trespassing Sign and a Welcome Mat,” News Release, August 13, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/media/releases/race-conscious-measures-and-us-constitution-cacs-brief-fisher-explains-difference

 

Brown v. Brown: Will the Supreme Court Interpret the Equal Protection Clause to Invalidate Measures Designed to Promote Equal Opportunity and Redress Our Nation’s Long History of Racial Discrimination?” The Constitution at a Crossroads Series,  May 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/crossroads/brown-v-brown-will-supreme-court-interpret-equal-protection-clause-invalidate

 

“Perfecting the Declaration: The Text and History of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” CAC Text and History Narrative, June 2011: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/narrative/perfecting-declaration-text-and-history-equal-protection-clause-fourteenth

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft

In Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft

In Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Pizarro Reyes v. Raycraft

In Pizarro Reyes v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.