Civil and Human Rights

CAC Reacts To Supreme Court Opinion Striking Down Part Of Iconic Voting Rights Act

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news that the Supreme Court this morning struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans released the following reaction after exiting the Court:

 

“Today is a sad day for all Americans who care about protection of one our most fundamental rights, the right to vote. In striking down a core provision of the Voting Rights Act, the Court flouts the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment, which expressly give to Congress broad powers to prevent and deter all forms of racial discrimination in voting.

 

“As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explained in a powerful dissent, Congress properly used these broad constitutional powers to prevent current and ongoing racial discrimination in voting concentrated in the covered jurisdictions.

 

“Justice Ginsburg further explained that Congress was not required to update the coverage forumla, bacuse the Voting Rights Act’s 15,000-page record in 2006 shows that pre-clearance continues to cover the jusrisdictions with the worst record of voting discrimination.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Shelby County v. Holder, arguing that the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment require the Voting Rights Act be upheld:

http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Constitutional-Accountability-Center-Shelby-Supreme-Court-Amicus.pdf

 

“How to judge the Supreme Court’s upcoming equality rulings,” Doug Kendall and David Gans, May 31, 2013: http://news.yahoo.com/judge-supreme-court-upcoming-equality-rulings-133411843.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...
Criminal Law
November 11, 2025

Supreme Court to hear compassionate release case

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
[video width="1028" height="576" mp4="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Recording-2025-11-17-090534.mp4"][/video] WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - The Supreme Court is set to hear...
Rule of Law
November 15, 2025

Justice Jackson goes ‘her own way’ in Supreme Court’s SNAP fight

CNN
As she oversaw President Donald Trump’s emergency Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, case this...
Criminal Law
November 12, 2025

CAC Release: Justices Assess Whether Judges Can Consider Evolving Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Rutherford v....
Criminal Law
November 12, 2025

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Commitment to Text and History at Stake in Case Involving Federal Prisoners

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Fernandez v....
Civil and Human Rights
November 9, 2025

Supreme Court to hear case on religious rights in prison

Deseret News
Oral arguments on Monday in Landor v. Louisiana will focus on religious liberties while incarcerated.