Civil and Human Rights

CAC Reacts To Supreme Court’s Marriage Equality Rulings

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its opinions in the two marriage equality cases argued this Term – Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor – Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer released the following statement:

 

“Today was a big victory for equality at the Supreme Court.

 

“In a resounding decision striking down a core part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the court held that the Constitution prohiibits the federal government from making legally married same-sex couples second class citizens.

 

“Then, in a second ruling, the Court let stand the District Court’s holding that California’s Proposition 8 violates the Fourteenth Amendment rights of gay men and lesbians in California. Proposition 8 and the regime of federal discrimination under DOMA are no more. 

 

“Ten years ago today in the landmark case of Lawrence v. Texas, the Court struck down state laws making gay men and lesbians criminals. Today is another huge step forward in vindicating the Constitution’s promise of equality for all persons.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s case page, including “friend of the court” brief, for Hollingsworth v. Perry (Proposition 8): http://theusconstitution.org/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry

 

CAC’s case page, including “friend of the court” brief, for United States v. Windsor (DOMA): http://theusconstitution.org/cases/united-states-v-windsor 

 

“Will Supreme Court recognize my marriage?,” Judith E. Schaeffer , March 27, 2013:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/03/26/supreme-court-gay-marriage/2022377/ 

 

“It’s Not A Mystery When State Laws Prohibiting Same-Sex Couples From Marrying ‘Became Unconstitutional’”

Elizabeth B. Wydra, March 26, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1900/its-not-mystery-when-state-laws-prohibiting-same-sex-couples-marrying-became 

 

Perry: A Resounding Affirmation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Universal Guarantee of Equality,” David H. Gans, 

February 9, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1293/perry-v-brown-resounding-affirmation-fourteenth-amendment%E2%80%99s-universal-guarantee 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

 

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.