Corporate Accountability

Can Corporations Pray? Supreme Court To Hear Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision to hear the case of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores later this Term – a dispute over whether certain corporations must comply with the Affordable Care Act’s so-called contraception mandate – Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

“In more than 225 years since the ratification of the Constitution, the Court has never held that a secular for-profit corporation has the right to free exercise of religion under the First Amendment, and it shouldn’t start now. With courts around the country splitting on this important question, the Court had to take this case, and now that it is before the Court, the Justices should firmly reject the assertion by Hobby Lobby and other corporations that the ACA’s contraception mandate is unconstitutional.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC cert-stage “friend of the court” brief in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_Sebelius_v_Hobby_Lobby_certstage_brief.pdf

 

“Can Corporations Pray? The Affordable Care Act, the Contraception Mandate, and the Free Exercise Rights of For-Profit Corporations,” CAC Issue Brief: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Issue-Brief-Can-Corporations-Pray-1.pdf

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...