CFPB Structure: Major Court Victory for Dodd-Frank and Members of Congress 

Full D.C. Circuit holds the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s leadership structure is constitutional, noting Supreme Court previously approved “the very means of independence Congress used here: protection of agency leadership from at-will removal by the President.”

Washington, DC – This morning, an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its ruling in PHH Corporation, et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, rejecting a challenge to the CFPB’s structure, holding that the CFPB’s single independent Director is constitutional. In a brief that echoed loudly in the opinion of the court, Constitutional Accountability Center represented more than three dozen current and former Members of Congress who led the crafting and passage of the landmark Dodd-Frank legislation that created the CFPB.

“Today’s ruling was a slam dunk for the CFPB,” said Brianne Gorod, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center. “The court recognized that Congress was well within its constitutional authority when it decided to place a single Director removable only for cause at the helm of the CFPB. As the court explained, that design is completely consistent with Supreme Court precedent going back decades.” Gorod continued, “Members of Congress believed, and still believe, that it is critical to the mission of the CFPB that it remain independent of the President, so it can act promptly and decisively in response to new threats to consumers. The D.C. Circuit today made it clear: that leadership structure is constitutional, and arguments to the contrary are wholly without merit.”

Current and former Members of Congress represented on CAC’s brief include former Senator Christopher Dodd, former Representative Barney Frank, Senator Elizabeth Warren, who originally proposed the CFPB, as well as Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Sherrod Brown, and House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters.

#

Resources:

Brief on behalf of current and former Members of Congress in support of the CFPB: https://www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/PHH_v_CFPB_DC_Cir_En_Banc_Amicus_Final.pdf

“Constitutional and Accountable: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” CAC white paper, Brianne J. Gorod, Brian R. Frazelle, and Simon Lazarus, October 2016: https://www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/20161020_White_Paper_CFPB.pdf 

Testimony of Brianne J. Gorod to the House Financial Services Committee, March 21, 2017: https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hhrg-115-ba09-wstate-bgorod-20170321.pdf 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Supreme Court yet to decide on Election Day, Trump firings

Roll Call
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod and her fellow panelists at CAC's 13th Annual Home Stretch at...
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

CAC Release: Arraignment of SPLC Yet Another Step in Trump Administration March Against American Rights and Freedoms

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to today’s arraignment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Bondi Corroded DOJ’s Integrity. Congress Must Now Demand Change

Bloomberg Law
CAC Vice President Praveen Frenandes and former DC Bar President Patrick McGlone co-authored an article...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Patrick McGlone
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC

In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, the Third Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega

In Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget

In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s Office of Management and...