Champions & Visionaries: Doug Kendall, Constitutional Accountability Center

 

National Law Journal
Champions & Visionaries
June 27, 2011

Doug Kendall
Constitutional Accountability Center

 

Three years ago, Douglas Kendall had a vision of reclaiming the Constitution for the legal left. Taking a cue from conservatives, he created the Constitutional Accountability Center in 2008, pledging to mobilize legal action and advocacy on behalf of progressive platforms, like marriage equality, immigrant rights and campaign finance reform.

Image: Diego M. Radzinschi / Legal Times

With an influx of money and support from left-leaning foundations and private donors during the past three years, the center’s budget has doubled to $1.2 million and continues to grow at a steady clip. Kendall started with three staff members, and is now about to hire a 10th person.

By 2016, Kendall said, the goal is to have a $3 million budget and staff of 25. “We’ve been involved in most of the biggest cases to go before the Supreme Court over the last three years, and I think that has increased our visibility,” he said.

Akhil Amar, a Yale Law School professor whose work on the Constitution helped inspire Kendall’s idea for the center, said Kendall brought the right mix of ideas and entrepreneurial spirit. “He took an idea and operationalized it. He made it three-dimensional,” Amar said. The center functions as a public interest law firm, think tank and advocacy center, and Kendall said he’s gearing up to expand all three areas.

“We’ve had a big impact on the conversation about the Constitution in the courts,” Kendall said. “Funders that are concerned about the future of the Supreme Court see that and are therefore willing to invest in the future.”

— Zoe Tillman

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 26, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...