Corporate Accountability

Claims To Narrowness In Hobby Lobby Can’t Hide Sweeping Ruling

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys – who were in the Court for this morning’s announcement – issued the following reaction:

 

“For the first time in our Nation’s history,” said CAC President Doug Kendall, “the Supreme Court has ruled that for-profit corporations have religious rights and have accorded them religious exemptions. Despite their attempts to qualify that ruling, it opens the floodgates to claims by corporations for religious exemptions.”

 

“As Justice Ginsburg explained in a powerful dissent,” continued CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans,”the Court puts claims of corporations over those of its employees and allows a corporation’s owners to override the Federal rights of its employees, many of whom have a different set of religious beliefs.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “While the Court purports to limit its ruling to closely-held corporations on this issue only, the majority opinion invites a number of  ‘me too’ religious objections by other companies on matters ranging from anti-discrimination law to other medical procedures such as blood transfusions or vaccinations.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

“Will the Supreme Court Give Corporations the Right to Impose Religious Beliefs on Employees?” Elizabeth Wydra, June 29, 2014: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-gi_b_5541816.html

 

“Do The Rights of Employees Count?: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Hobby Lobby,” David H. Gans, March 27, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2590/do-rights-employees-count-supreme-court-hears-oral-argument-hobby-lobby

 

“Discrimination, Inc.,” David H. Gans, February 26, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2509/discrimination-inc

 

CAC case page for Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/sebelius-v-hobby-lobby-stores-and-conestoga-wood-v-sebelius

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
April 24, 2026

How the Supreme Court will have a major impact on the economy this spring

CNN
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod spoke to CNN about big business at the Supreme Court. Read...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Nemer v. Bondi

In Nemer v. Bondi, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether an Immigration Judge can invoke the protections of Title VII and the First Amendment after being removed by...
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Supreme Court yet to decide on Election Day, Trump firings

Roll Call
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod and her fellow panelists at CAC's 13th Annual Home Stretch at...
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

CAC Release: Arraignment of SPLC Yet Another Step in Trump Administration March Against American Rights and Freedoms

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to today’s arraignment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Bondi Corroded DOJ’s Integrity. Congress Must Now Demand Change

Bloomberg Law
CAC Vice President Praveen Frenandes and former DC Bar President Patrick McGlone co-authored an article...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Patrick McGlone
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC

In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, the Third Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.