Congressional Democrats sue Trump to force emoluments disclosure

By Stephen Dinan

Nearly 200 congressional Democrats filed a lawsuit Wednesday morning against President Trump saying his business interests are likely violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause by collecting money from foreign governments without permission from Capitol Hill.

Led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Rep. John Conyers Jr., the lawsuit asks a federal judge to order Mr. Trump to come to Congress for approval of his business arrangements.

The lawsuit appears to be an attempt to force Mr. Trump to disclose his business dealings to Congress, after the president has refused to release his tax returns.

“Defendant’s refusal to disclose to Congress the foreign emoluments he wishes to accept makes it impossible for Plaintiffs to judge whether any specific foreign emolument should be approved,” they say in their complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. “Defendant has therefore denied Plaintiffs the opportunity to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether to authorize his acceptance of particular emoluments from foreign states. The Constitution expressly demands that Plaintiffs be given that opportunity.”

The lawsuit runs to 54 pages. The list of 30 senators and 166 House members who joined the suit took up 17 of those pages.

Mr. Trump refused to divest himself of ownership in the Trump Organization, a vast network of hotels, golf courses and other properties, when he took office. He turned day-to-day operations over to his children, and said he would donate any profits from foreign government patrons of his hotels to the federal Treasury Department.

Some legal analysts have questioned whether that’s sufficient.

In their lawsuit, the Democrats list a number of potential violations, including the Chinese government’s granting of trademarks to Trump companies; room bookings by diplomats at Trump branded hotels; and foreign government operations that are tenants in Trump real estate in New York.

It’s unclear how courts will treat the lawsuit. Federal judges have often tossed complaints by members of Congress against the president, arguing political disputes should be fought in the political arena, not the courthouse.

But a federal judge in Washington has allowed a lawsuit to proceed against President Obama, filed by the U.S. House, over Obamacare payments he was making despite Congress refusing to appropriate the money.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes