Access to Justice

Constitutional Accountability Center Expands, Adds Accomplished Lawyers Lazarus and Bobroff

Washington, DC – Constitutional Accountability Center – founded in 2008 as a think tank, law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history – is augmenting its growing professional team with two additional highly experienced and accomplished lawyers, Simon Lazarus and Rochelle Bobroff, currently with the Federal Rights Project of the National Senior Citizens Law Center.   

Through its three divisions, CAC engages in the key arenas where the war over the Constitution and the courts will be won or lost: the battle of ideas (scholarship), the battle in the courts (litigation), and the battle over the courts (the public square).  At the same time, Lazarus and Bobroff have played an essential and complementary role, spotlighting and countering the rulings of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts that have limited access to the courts and eviscerated landmark federal safeguards for health and retirement security, consumer protection, workplace fairness and equal opportunity. 

 

The writings and advocacy of Lazarus and Bobroff have been important in helping to focus the debate over the federal judiciary on how the pro-corporate, close-the-courthouse-doors rulings of the Roberts Court are affecting the pocketbooks of hardworking Americans.  Furthermore, their scholarship has effectively demonstrated the link between the constitutional vision of conservatives on the Roberts Court – which sharply departs from the Constitution’s text and history – and the Court’s activism in limiting federal statutes and eliminating access to courts, drawing together the mutually-reinforcing work of CAC and FRP.

 

Doug Kendall, founder and President of CAC, said “Constitutional Accountability Center and Si and Rochelle have long been engaged in the critical argument that progressives must change, sharpen and smarten up the way we fight over the Constitution and the courts, rather than hope that more of the same will produce better results.  I am delighted to welcome Si and Rochelle to CAC and look forward to relying on their expertise as we continue our work to counter the right’s increasingly aggressive attempts to distort our Constitution and compromise America’s federal judiciary.”

 

Lazarus and Bobroff will join the staff of CAC on July 1.  

 

#

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

 

More from Access to Justice

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 9, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.