Constitutional Accountability Center Files its First Brief in the Supreme Court Case of Wyeth v. Levine

Constitutional Accountability Center today filed its first brief in the Supreme Court case of Wyeth v. Levine, as amicus curiae in support of the respondent, Diana Levine. Ms. Levine, a professional musician, sued the pharmaceutical company Wyeth in Vermont court based on injuries she suffered—including amputation of her right arm— after she was injected with an anti-nausea drug manufactured by Wyeth. The Vermont courts sided with Ms. Levine, but Wyeth and its supporters have challenged this ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Wyeth v. Levine presents the question of whether state-law claims against drug manufacturers for failing to properly warn consumers about dangerous risks associated with their products should be displaced by federal law and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation. CAC has filed its amicus curiae brief in support of allowing state common law claims to work in conjunction with FDA oversight, because neither the Constitution nor the principles behind it support such a broad intrusion into the States’ ability to protect their citizens, particularly where Congress has not expressed its intent to preempt state law.

 

CAC assists State and local officials in upholding valid and democratically enacted measures and historic common law remedies. Over the last decade, CAC’s predecessor organization, Community Rights Counsel, filed amicus briefs in preemption cases before the Supreme Court in support of many State and local laws.

 

Download the brief (PDF)

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission

In Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether a showing of pecuniary harm to investors is a prerequisite to an award of disgorgement in a civil action brought by the...
Immigration and Citizenship
April 1, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Skeptical of Administration’s Domicile-Driven Approach to Birthright Citizenship

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
March 31, 2026

Most Americans Favor Birthright Citizenship. That Wasn’t Always True.

New York Times
Elizabeth Wydra was quoted in the New York Times discussing the history of the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 30, 2026

Why the Supreme Court will get the birthright citizenship case right

National Catholic Reporter
Smita Ghosh's Slate article about Lynch v. Clarke and birthright citizenship was cited in an op-ed in the National Catholic...
Criminal Law
March 31, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Availability of Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pitchford v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Civil and Human Rights
March 31, 2026

CAC Release: In Chiles, Roberts Court Continues Its Dangerous Distortion of the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiles v. Salazar, a...
By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes